Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45
From: john@kk9a.com
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:58:51 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
If you are investing in four 6m beams, maybe $500 each, a rotator $1k?.
plus an H frame, etc, skimping on the tower just to get them in the air
seems foolish. There are plenty of 30' towers that are rated for this
windload and they are not much more expensive than the proposed Rohn 45
sections.  Besides if it falls there is still risk to humans and animals
should they have the misfortune of being in the wrong spot at the wrong
time.

John KK9A


To:     towertalk@contesting.com
Subject:         Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45
From:    Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date:    Thu, 26 Dec 2013 07:58:18 -0800
List-post:       <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 12/26/13 4:42 AM, Gregg Seidl wrote:

One thing to think about is whether you care if it falls down in an
extreme wind event. You might be willing to take the risk, in exchange for
getting your antennas on the air.


Sounds like an interesting project, especially if you're somewhat failure
tolerant.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>