In Sept. 2010, W1ZR wrote not a review, but an unflattering analysis of
terminated folded dipoles based on his analyses and those of VE2CV.
It's on the QST archives. Basically, the caveat is understanding the trade off
between bandwidth and performance. Let me guess, the marketing copy you saw
didn't talk about reduced performance, did it?
Nothing wrong with prioritizing bandwidth. Just as long as you know what you
might be sacrificing to get it.
73, Kelly
ve4xt
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:49 AM, "Chuck Smallhouse" <w7cs@theriver.com> wrote:
>
> Recently I saw an ad, in maybe QST, by a company selling a dipole that looked
> like the B & W one. Maybe they bought the rights from B & W ? Does anyone
> recall the ad and where I saw it ? I've looked through two or three recent
> QSTs and can't seem to find it .
>
> Also two or three years ago someone wrote a not too complimentary article, in
> QST, about the B & W folded dipole . Does anyone recall what issue that was ?
>
> Thanks & 73,
>
> Chuck, W7CS
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|