Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendations for Purchasing a short 2 Element 40 Mete

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendations for Purchasing a short 2 Element 40 Meter
From: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:18:47 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I forgot to mention to apply tape on the PVC openings - decreases bird nests 
and such ! :)

I misread your first sentence - yes, it is a coil OF coax. :)

73, Jamie
WB4YDL

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 1, 2014, at 2:14 PM, "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com> wrote:
> 
> Is it a coil or coax ? Yes and yes ! :) I use lightweight 3 1/2" sewer PVC 
> and use it as a form for wrapping the appropriate number (depending on 
> frequency) turns of coax (I had Buryflex on hand). You have to drill a few 
> holes in the PVC and use zip (cable) ties to hold the coax while wrapping. 
> Then tape it up nice with Scotch 33 or 88 and put PL259 connectors on each 
> end. I use a Budwig (center dipole connector) and solder ring lugs on the 
> wire terminals and bend them forward for your yagi connection. The SO259 
> connector of the Budwig makes it easy to connect to and waterproof. Of course 
> you can just break out the two conductors of the coax and put lugs on 
> directly, I just found its more contained to add connectors.
> 
> As to the proper number of turns of coax - 
> http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html . Interesting reading.
> 
> 73, Jamie
> WB4YDL
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 12:59 PM, "L L bahr " <pulsarxp@embarqmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> What is that, Jamie?  Are you using a coil of coax?  That is what I think 
>> I'll be using.
>> Lee, w0vt
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>
>> To: towertalk@contesting.com
>> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 12:21:10 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Recommendations for Purchasing a short 2 Element 40 
>>    Meter
>> 
>> I quit using the old B-1 balun. I use the "Ugly balun" on all antennas. 
>> Works extremely well with no heat degradation.
>> 
>> 73, Jamie
>> WB4YDL
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 11:36 AM, "Dale Drake" <daleaa1qd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I had a recent bad experience with the Cushcraft XM-240.  The present
>>> manufacturer had changed the U channel design from the original when it was
>>> made by the NH company.  The original design ( according to the guy that
>>> actually designed it) used a heat treated aluminum channel but the "new"
>>> design uses a thinner channel formed from sheet in a brake ( not heat
>>> treated). 
>>> 
>>> Mine was of the newer design and the wind ( 40-50MPH gusts from the remnants
>>> of Bob) tore the 1/4" hex head cap screw heads right through the U channel
>>> on one side and left the element dangling.  I called the manufacturer in MS
>>> who said they had never heard of that failure but they sent me a new U
>>> channel for free.  I put large stainless fender washers under the heads of
>>> the 1/4" cap screws this time to spread the stress out more and so far so
>>> good.  If I was to do it over I would replace the less rugged U channel with
>>> something more like the original design.
>>> 
>>> If you want to see the pics email me directly aa1qd@arrl.net
>>> 
>>> Also if you plan on 1.5KW AM I would not use the stock balun as it is like
>>> to fail with that much heating from what I've heard from other hams.
>>> 
>>> Dale 
>>> AA1QD
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>> 
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>