To: | Ray Benny <rayn6vr@cableone.net>, Paul Braiman <braimanbiz@charter.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Using old concrete in new pour |
From: | Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:03:19 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Rather than the lawyers, I think it is the building code writers - check
out the upgrades to the required wind velocities and exposure
calculations in the EIA specs over the years. Then the enforcers in
your local permit office require compliance and tower manufacturers
comply or sell fewer towers.
Lawyers however, are at the end of that food chain (your choice as to which end). not a lawyer Grant KZ1W On 10/22/2014 6:50 PM, Ray Benny wrote: I recently poured a base for a 90 ft Sky Needle tower. The original plans call for a 4 X 4 X 8 ft hole. I believe current requirements are 5 X 5 X 9 ft. What's funny, this same tower that I own survived for more than 30 years with the smaller foundation thru many monsoon winds, micro-bursts, lightning and all. The County engineers here did not have the newer specs on had, but felt the old ones were adequate. I agree, "the lawyers have changed the engineering specs over the years". Ray, N6VR On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Paul Braiman <braimanbiz@charter.net> wrote:I just finished erecting a Tashjian LM 354HD. Spec for the concrete base was 3.5' x 3.5' by 7' deep. I ended up with 4' x 4' x 8’. I sleep slightly better at night. :) On Oct 22, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com> wrote:On Oct 22, 2014, at 10:39 AM, David Gallatin via TowerTalk wrote:I have a pour scheduled for Monday. $233 for 1.5 yds direct into myhole, which I go now to dig. My back hurts already. :) 73,Yikes, I hope you aren't digging it by hand! Better hurry up and hopeyou don't hit rock!(I have a rock layer here at 40" down.) As for your original question, I find it amazing how requirements havechanged since I got my license (1963). Look around at all the towers standing for 30 years and I'll bet they don't have high strength concrete and complex rebar. They just won't last.... ;-) Seriously, I put up a 64' freestanding Heights tower twice in 1970 and 1975 and hand mixed the concrete (two days on the first one using Sackrete) and it only needed a 4x4x4 base back then with a TA-33 tribander and other antennas on it.I do think the lawyers have changed the engineering specs over the years. Good luck digging, Ken WA8JXM _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Ham IV Direction Controller PLUS, Donn Drury |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps, Keith Dutson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Using old concrete in new pour, Ray Benny |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Using old concrete in new pour, Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |