Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower price increase

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower price increase
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:43:21 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 1/2/17 11:38 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
Great response, Jim. BUT -- the increase noted by the original poster
was that the increase was overnight!

Several possible reasons for this. One is that business operations for
the ham market are often supported by higher volume and higher margin
operations for other markets. When those other markets fall apart, they
no longer support the ham market, or contribute to economies of scale
that allow lower prices.

Another is corporate mergers, which can change business priorities,
change where products are manufactured.

But assuming corporate greed as the reason for all such price increases
is unreasonable. It certainly can be, but there are many other reasons.


yes, I agree.. usually it's a "it's not economic to sell at that price any more, compared to other products". I was more commenting on the "back in 85" comment.

I know someone who is buying 50 tower trailers with 100+ ft towers on them. That's a much better sale proposition than onsie, twosie sales to individuals. Whether through distribution or not, the support costs tend to be "per customer" not "per tower".

As for the overnight x3... That's a "we don't really want to be in this business" or "our cost structure radically changed" kind of increase.

I've also seen that when you have a business founder of a family operated business retires/sells out: the founder didn't have any debt service costs, was willing to live out whatever margin there was. The new owner had to get a loan to buy the business and actually has to pay employees a wage and benefits - all of a sudden instead of "my wife does the assembly and we're on the same insurance" it's "I've got to pay a reasonable wage and provide vacation, insurance, etc.", I've got to pay rent and storage costs, I've got to pay for the "cost of money".

A similar phenomenon occurs when a partner retires/dies/leaves and the remaining partners have to buy them out.

Or, it's just - we don't want to leave existing customers totally in the lurch, but we can't subsidize them either - we'll be responsible and at least make parts available, but at cost that is basically "fabricate from scratch individually"










_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>