Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower base over ROCK (shale) experience??

To: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower base over ROCK (shale) experience??
From: bear <bear@bearlabs.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:22:31 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Whoa... a lot of information there, and many questions.
Please keep in mind I am on the lower end of the learning curve, so some of what I say or ask
may be total "newbie".

- Does your "base" merely rest on the bare rock??
My thought was that a much smaller base would work, especially if the rock was drilled and fitted
with reybar to some depth, with the concrete (reinforced) over that...

- Stresses in the base. My limited understanding says that the majority of force by a large margin is vertical (downward) force, other forces being very limited in a guyed tower. So a strong concrete base of modest size directly to rock ought to be able to support anything in the 100ft +/1 class with no real concerns??

- Pier Pin?
Are we talking about a tapered base section that sits on top of a flat surface, steel pin protruding for
alignment?

- torque, just double checking, you are talking about the rotational torque that will come as the result of slight (or larger) variances in the angle of the guy anchor points on the ground vs. the position up the tower? Frankly, had not thought much about that. But how is that handled in a typical installation??

Given that I am considering doing Rohn 45 @~100ft with a modest top load of likely only a tribander yagi or similar and maybe a 2m beam (maybe), so I won't have the wind load some have... of course looking to the future and more ambitions is not a bad thing to do either... I am ONLY going to go for this IF I can get the tower up and down with one or two people. As of now, that points directly to the "falling derrick" method. At least that is what I am considering. Still formulating the full complexity and so the cost, will have to see IF it saves anything at all vs. some sort of crank up affair or not. However the base on rock is most likely to be required, and has held me back for
some time, not knowing much about the success of such things.

                          _-_-

On 10/13/2017 10:49 AM, Bob Shohet, KQ2M wrote:
Yes, A LOT of experience at my qth!
My 130’ Rohn 45G tower rests on a pier pin on a Rohn 45 flat base on a very wide and long concrete base ranging from only 9” – 18” deep MAXIMUM! To spread out the stresses, I made the concrete base overly large ~ 6’ long by 4’ wide and I used LOTS of rebar in the concrete in the base which was in a short wire cage also constructed of rebar, and all inside a wooden form that we constructed. We could not go down any deeper because of all the ledge on the top of my hill. Blasting would have been the only other option and it was not an option for me. So, to minimize the tower rotation stresses of the extremely high winds at my qth, I decided to use a flat base and pier pin so that the tower guys could “self-equalize” the torque as necessary. The first day of tower building we were quickly alerted to just how much stress can quickly build up when, shortly after the first 40’ was put up and the tower guys were being tightened, we heard a ear-splitting incredibly loud metallic BANG!!, which apparently was just the tower “equalizing” the guy torque by rotating about 1inch !!! And that was just from the first 40’ of tower with nothing on it! If we ever had any questions about how valuable a flat base and pier pin installation is, they were immediately and emphatically answered! Now to answer your question, my 130’ tower holds 3 5L Hygain HG205CA’s (top rotatable with Orion 2800PX and 14’ chrommoly mast) and an 40-2CD fixed SSE. These antennas and tower has been up through Hurricane Sandy (110+ mph wind gusts), Hurricane Irene 85 mph wind gusts, an F0 and F1 tornado (direct hits) and more Nor-easters and T-storms with 70 – 90+ mph wind gusts than I can count. Not to mention the stresses from 100+ icing events since 1998 when I put up the tower. No problems with the tower ever. I must add though that in 2009, I made the decision to switch from regular guys to star guys at the 80’ and 120’ levels. It was after the star guys were put up that we had the two hurricanes and the F1 tornado. I can’t say for sure whether the tower would have survived them with just regular guys. But I do know that the tower base has never cracked despite all violence. I would suggest that you use oversize guy anchors and equalizer plates as I did and make your guy anchor holes longer and deeper as well and use a high grade concrete from a concrete company rather than making your own in a mixer. The higher the quality and smoother the concrete the better. And, the bigger and stronger the guys, guy anchors, equalizer plates and turnbuckles, the better; especially if you are concerned about the tower base.
73
Bob  KQ2M
*From:* bear <mailto:bear@bearlabs.com>
*Sent:* Friday, October 13, 2017 9:58 AM
*To:* towertalk@contesting.com <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
*Subject:* [TowerTalk] Tower base over ROCK (shale) experience??
Anyone have advice/experience with placing a tower over/on a rock surface?
Short of blasting a hole, that is...

My QTH is very thin soil over solid shale surface, it's a hill mostly.

                        _-_-WBear2GCR
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>