Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Modeling

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Modeling
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:46:39 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

You'd be surprised how many wire antennas I've actually built over the years, having tried several different ones each year for Field Day.  You can check the scores over the past 20 years to see what the result was ... mostly category 1B one or two op QRP.  K7ZB and I even held the all time 1B2op battery record for a couple of years at 10,000 points (set back in 2000).

The difference is that I modeled almost every one of those antennas ahead of time.  The only thing I lost was the opportunity to waste a lot of time and money ... while gaining a lot more understanding. The basic version of EZNEC is free with the ARRL Antenna Book, so I'm not sure what position would keep you from using it other than simply preferring not to.

I suppose I could eventually build a small transmitter by wiring random components together on a breadboard over and over again, but that doesn't sound like "ham" radio to me either.

73,
Dave   AB7E


On 7/11/2018 5:38 PM, Dan Bookwalter via TowerTalk wrote:
Jim
Oh I fully understand,  but , I am not currently in a position to do that ... when I 
get back to a point where I can put up a real antenna(s),  I am sure I will ask 
these questions ...but , I still like just winging something in the air and letting 
er'rip so to speak...
My opinion may be out dated , but , I still maintain we have lost some of 
that...
Dan

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Jim Brown<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote: On 7/11/2018 5:08 PM, Dan Bookwalter via TowerTalk wrote:
I know everyone is onto modeling everything,  I am in the camp of , put it up , 
give it a try , dont like it , try again ...
We have lost so much of the "ham" part of ham radio... I used to , and still do 
, throw a wire out and see what you can do ... other than 160 and probably 80 , you can 
work a suprising amount of stuff ..
My view is completely the opposite -- to me, ham radio is studying the
fundamentals and using that knowledge to build our stations, including
antennas, that work better. Wandering around in the dark is not part of
my view of ham radio.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>