Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Half Wave?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Half Wave?
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:38:49 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 1/17/2019 9:46 AM, Warren Wolff via TowerTalk wrote:
My understanding is that a yagi should be at least 1/2wave above ground to avoid warming the 
clouds.   So, considering that thought, how much does an antennasuffer if such antenna is 
63 feet up instead of 67 feetfor 40 meters over VERY rocky "soil"?

I have two answers to your question, one of which is simple and the other is not. The simple one first -- several years ago, I did a modeling study using NEC studying the effect of height and soil quality on horizontal and vertical antennas for the HF bands. NEC is only able to consider flat earth. The results of that study are summarized in this report. http://k9yc.com/AntennaPlanning.pdf ; The executive summary is that higher is better.

The more complex answer is the interaction of antennas with terrain. For that, a study of the ARRL Handbook and use of N6BV's HFTA (High Frequency Terrain Analysis) software is in order. The executive summary is that 1) being close to a drop-off can provide a LOT of gain in the direction of the drop-off and that antennas don't need to be high; and 2) that terrain in any direction can strongly influence optimum height for antennas for each band.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>