Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] JK 402 versus CC XM-240

To: Towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] JK 402 versus CC XM-240
From: Tony Brock-Fisher via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Tony Brock-Fisher <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:02:17 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I would strongly recommend the JK402T over the XM-240. I know you asked about the JK402; but the JK402T is a much better choice - just take a look at the SWR curves of each antenna, and you will see that the JK402T is much more broadbanded.

I replaced a working CC 40-2CD, which is electrically identical to the XM-240, with a W6NL Moxon, which is very close to the JK402T.

One would not expect much difference, replacing a 2-element 40 meter antenna on a 22' boom with another 2-element antenna on a 22' boom.

In my case it was NIGHT and DAY, a tremendous and noticeable improvement. I attribute this to lower loss in the loading coils, and better directivity per element due to longer length.

The broadbandedness of the Tee-style loading design is amazing, and my AL-1200 amp requires little adjustment while covering all of the CW or SSB portion of the band in a contest.

I would not hesitate to recommend the JK402T, based on the performance and design. Others have commented positively on JK Antennas build quality and mechanical sturdiness.

No, I do not own one.

-Tony, K1KP

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>