Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding a Vertical an easier wat

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding a Vertical an easier wat
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:07:58 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

I actually found a post that N4KG himself made a couple of years after his QST article where he mentioned that the performance of his inverted system seemed to be worse than what he once had with a full set of buried radials under a shunt fed tower.  He pointedly stated that the lower the elevated radials on his inverted system, the worse the performance even when matched.

As you say, SWR doesn't tell the full story for actual performance.

73,
Dave   AB7E


On 9/6/2019 12:55 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

The N4KG system looks good when evaluated for SWR and ease of
installation.  It, however, has serious performance issues.

1) W8JI and others are right - there can be significant ground
   losses depending on the division of current up/down the
   tower from the "feedpoint".  The only time that loss is
   truly negligible is if the tower is *NOT* grounded (mounted
   on insulators) and all feed/control lines have high impedance
   chokes at ground level.

2) The division of current up/down the tower can also result in
   significant skewing of the take off angle and cancellation
   (currents are out of phase due to the ground connection) at
   critical angles.

Unfortunately, Cebik's models understated ground effects - particularly
real (lossy) ground.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 2019-09-06 12:09 PM, Dave Thompson wrote:

Gang,

This is my annual request that there is a simpler way to feed a tower.  Tom N4KG wrote an excellent article on his reverse feed system in the April 1994 QST. With Tom's system using elevated radials (either loaded or full length) you feed the coax to a radial and the shield to the tower.  We used a MFJ 259 to find a place to attach the radials for a match on the tower.  Tom also had an excellent section of calculating top load to get electrical length. If you don't have the actual QST you can down load the article. Cebik contributed an article on reverse feed of towers and showed that there little ground loss that W8JI and others predicted.

We did two towers one 60 feet and one 90 feet and the results were very good with great DX.  Tom ran several towers and most low band DXers know his results.  Sadly Tom became a SK last year. Best DX was Zone 17 on CW and Zone 25 UA0 from GA on SSB.

73 Dave K4JRB

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>