Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 80m 4 square - revisted

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80m 4 square - revisted
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:02:44 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 1/20/20 2:38 PM, Thomas Collins wrote:
Gentlemen,

My plan still is to to install a 80m wire 4 square with 4 FCP's per K2AV's 
article:   https://k2av.com/Olinger_NCJ_article_on_FCP.pdf    On the the bottom 
of page 5, Guy mentions using an FCP on 80m.

In the article, Guy uses an isolation transformer, and also mentions using one 
on 80 with 5 less turns (15T for 80, 20T for 160).

I have modeled the array, and it does show decent gain and F/B.   I'll be using 
a Comtek box for switching, and purchased phasing cables from DXE, which are 
the ones with the ferrite beads on the end.


when you modeled it, did you model the phasing box, or just model the drive currents at the feedpoints?





With a Zoom 230 and a OSL calibration kit, my plan is to install one element 
with the FCP, measure the impedance at the feedpoint, and if necessary, build a 
matching network to get from the measured impedance to 35 ohms +j0.  Then 
repeat for the other three elements.

Question:   Is the choking impedance of the phasing cables with the beads 
sufficient for an FCP elevated radial system, or do I need the total 
elimination provided by the isolation transformer (as noted in Guy's article)?

Thanks!

Tom, N2SR

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>