Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS (not exactly towers, but HF)

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS (not exactly towers, but HF)
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:38:35 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 6/9/20 8:59 AM, Gene Smar via TowerTalk wrote:
TT:

      Regarding ridiculously low dipoles and NVIS operation, they really do 
work after a fashion.  In addition to towers, I collect military radios and am 
a member of the Military Radio Collectors' Association 
http://www.mrca.ar88.net/ .  We meet on the air several times a week on HF.  We 
also attend an annual gathering of the membership (predominantly east coast) 
each September in Gilbert, PA, in the Pocono Mountains.  Here we actually use 
our shorter-range 51 MHz FM radios as well as our backpack HF rigs that the US 
Special Forces used in 'nam.  Several of our members have told hair-raising 
stories about their use of these packs in the field.


There's an awful lot of hams running 75m and 40m on "low antennas" - Sure, most goes up, and that lets you do local comms, but it's not like there's NO low angle radiation.

And a lot of people are constrained to low heights or verticals for one reason or another - zoning, familial harmony, mobile/portable ops. After all field day is in a few weeks - you're probably not going to erect a temporary 80 m 3 element Yagi so that you can rule the band.

Ultimately, it comes down to building more advanced planning tools like HFTA. Right now people use HFTA to compare patterns to statistical propagation forecasts (from VOACAP and it's ilk).

I think, though, that there might be some fruitful work on a more tactical basis - people with crank up/down towers might find that there are "better heights" based on propagation *measurements* and modeling. (whether the model is in the brain of an experienced DXer or on a computer, it's all the same)


For those seeking professional literature on longer distance paths, look at over the horizon radar papers - OTH radar is not NVIS, almost by definition. And while you may not be able to set up 50 big LPDA antennas in a row with miles of coax and 50 amplifiers, a lot of the analytical techniques they use are useful to hams. Chris Coleman, VK5AHZ and G4HCW, in Australia, has done a lot of work for HF OTH radar, but also produced useful stuff for hams in terms of things like modeling the spatial distribution of lightning noise, and frequency management for low frequency radio telescopes, like I work with.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>