Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 278, Issue 4

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 278, Issue 4
From: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:29:02 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Jim,

Everything on the RF side of the RCS-4 remote is DC blocked with a capacitor relative to the common feed line, so you can place whatever loads you want on any of the switch ports and it won't impact the switch control function.

73, Mike W4EF............

On 2/10/2026 11:07 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
        


What I did was use a MFJ RCS-8 switch box, and have a short, open, and load at the antenna. So I 
can recalibrate my feedline (or test it separately - did the squirrels eat something?). You really 
only need the short and load. Open sort of comes for free.  I just soldered a 50 ohm 
non-inductive resistor for the load to one of the relays, and shorted another. You could probably 
do this with the RCS-4, but I'd have to think about how you'd set it up so the short or load 
doesn't foul up the control signals (yeah, there's sort of a bias T scheme).  Potential side 
benefit on some switch boxes - you can have the power off state be "grounded" for the 
antenna and feedline.

On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:59:34 -0500 (EST), JAMES WOLF via TowerTalk 
<towertalk@contesting.com> wrote:

Tom,

Ideally, you would include the feedline in the calibration of the test device. 
That's not usually practical either. What you can do, is to calculate how the 
feedline transforms the measurement. To do so, you need the impedance of the 
line, the velocity factor, and the loss at the frequency of measurement. Then 
you can model the feedline as a transmission line. attached to the source 
(antenna). You should be able to use a program such as TLDetails to do the 
math. https://ac6la.com/tldetails1.html


Jim - KR9U




On 02/10/2026 5:00 PM GMT towertalk-request@contesting.com wrote:


Send TowerTalk mailing list submissions to
towertalk@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
towertalk-request@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
towertalk-owner@contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Antenna Analyzer Question (Tom Hellem)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:37:48 -0700
From: Tom Hellem
To: towertalk
Subject: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Question
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

In order to make measurements of impedance, etc on an antenna with any of
the various analyzers on the market, one must connect the analyzer to the
antenna
with some length of coax. And unless the antenna being measured has a
feedpoint
impedance of 50 +/- j0, the impedance as seen by the analyzer is going to
vary
continuously all along the length of the coax, a phenomenon easily seen
with the use
of a program like TLW, etc.

Question is, unless I can attach the analyzer directly to the feedpoint,
how can I
obtain a reliably accurate measurement?

I just looked at the user manual for one of the popular analyzers on the
market.
It makes no mention of this whatsoever. And I don't remember it being in
any other manual I have seen in over 50 years of being in ham radio except
for one:
I have a manual for a simple and inexpensive VNA built from a kit several
years ago, sold by a German company, that makes a big deal out of doing
what it calls an SOL compensation for
the coax and any other connectors used between the VNA and the antenna.
This
supposedly removes any of the impedance transforming effect of the test
setup from the
equation and allows for a precise measurement of the antenna under test.

So what gives? Has anybody here ever wondered about this?
Am I overthinking it or is there something to it?

Tom
K0SN


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


------------------------------

End of TowerTalk Digest, Vol 278, Issue 4
*****************************************
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>