VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] [NEWSVHF] Here's a Proposed Solution for Digital/An

To: "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] [NEWSVHF] Here's a Proposed Solution for Digital/Analog       Operating (peter hutter)
From: jon jones <n0jk@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:36:16 +0000
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I noticed fewer people on 50 MHz MSK144 Sunday morning of the contest as well. 
With FT8, you would often get the infamous "One and Done" decodes of stations 
on meteor scatter. It is difficult to complete a contact. These may have been 
completed on MSK144.

John, KF0M was on 50 MHz FT4 in the June VHF contest and found it much better 
than FT8. Less QRM and higher rate.


  *
Jon N0JK


>I echo KO9A's post on 3830. Meteor Scatter activity on MSK144 seemed to be 
>sharply down during the ARRL VHF weekend, especially on 2m. I wish people who 
>insist on staying on FT8 would discover the excitement of this interactive 
>mode.

Somehow, FT4 has become a forgotten mode in recent years.? It is a much better 
mode for making QSOs when QSB is at play, whether it is Es or distant 
tropospheric conditions. Majority of the distant QSOs are made when signals 
finally appear out of the noise for a short period of time. Then they disappear 
until the next cycle. Maybe, aircraft scatter is at play more than we know.
Peter



_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>