| To: | 'VHF Contesting' <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] IC-905 6m |
| From: | Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | Buddy Morgan <beamar@aol.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Sep 2025 13:43:10 +0000 (UTC) |
| List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I would think a 144 to 222 and a 144 to 902 transverter would make sense.
Really you could add 3400, to the list, also.
Buddy WB4OMG
On Wednesday, September 17, 2025 at 09:16:10 AM EDT, VE3KH via
VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> wrote:
Hi
It would seem that some might want a 144 to 50 transverter so that one
doesn't need a second radio for 6m in VHF contests.
Any solutions?
73 Kevin VE3KH
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [NEWSVHF] Here's a Proposed Solution for Digital/Analog Operating (peter hutter), jon jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] IC-905 6m, Terry Price |
| Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] IC-905 6m, VE3KH via VHFcontesting |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] IC-905 6m, Terry Price |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |