[AMPS] Final (??) Comments on B&W850A

[Jon Ogden]

>The idea was to increase the minimum required C. You can move the tap
>around for other stepups but the balanced T arrangement is the one most
>often mentioned.
>
>Adding another completely seperate L ahead of the 10M coil works on paper
>but I have not tried it ; but would seem to add a reverse requirement on
>the lower band taps.

??

You and I suggest the same thing from what I can tell.  Who cares if it 
is 2 seperate inductors or tapped in the middle of one.  I don't follow 
your logic.  Perhaps I didn't read your original post correctly or 
something.

As for having a reverse requirement on the other bands I don't understand 
that either.  The L-net comprised of the Cout of the tube and the new 
inductor is of a low-pass topology.  So as you go lower in frequency its 
effect becomes less and less.


>Nothing is simple!

Well said!

73,

Jon
KE9NA



-------------------------------------
Jon Ogden
KE9NA

http://www.qsl.net/ke9na    <--- CHECK IT OUT!  It's been updated!!!!!


"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm