[AMPS] The Measures letter

[measures]

>
>Subject:        	Re: [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do?
>Date sent:      	Wed, 13 Sep 2000 13:27:44 -0700
>From:           	measures <2@vc.net>
>To:             	"AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>
>W8JI wrote:
>> >This is exactly why your rebuttal was rejected. It was full of 
>> >personal attacks.  Reid Brandon is an Engineer at Eimac, and 
>> >Buzz Mikolous (sp?) was an RD engineer who also disagreed with 
>> >you.
>
>
>Rich relies: 
>> The personel office rep. at Eimac, SLC said that Miklos never held the job
>> you claimed.  
>
>That is untrue. 
>
Why would they say that Miklos was an engineer B over the telephone.  

>WA4GPM (Buzz Miklos) was head of R&D in power grid tubes at 
>Salt Lake City. Eimac even issued a letter to that effect.
>
>You claimed Eimac's personal department or someone  forged the 
>information that Buzz Miklos was an engineer!!!
>
I said that Eimac  told me Miklos was an Engineer B at SLC.  

>Things like that don't win you any points Rich. That is exactly why 
>your "rebuttal" wasn't published.  
>
>> >Implying the engineers at Eimac who disagree with you "clean 
>> >toilets" doesn't win you any points.  
>> >
>> Trying to pass off a guy who works in Marketing as a guy who works in
>> Engineering is  deceptive. 
>
>You have your opinions.
> 
>> >Please make a signed copy of that letter available Rich. I have no 
>> >recollection of it. I want to read it.
>> >
>> Ä  Tom already knows that I discarded his threatening letter.  QST never
>> received their copy of the letter. > cheers, Tom.  
>
>Ohhh, I see. 
>
>1.) I wrote a letter to you and QST that you could use against me 
>that you "threw out". 

The letter was of minimal value.  Were I to quote it, you would likely 
deny that you wrote it.  
>
>2.) I can't remember that letter, but you can.
>
Remember kids, just say no to drugs.  

>3.) QST can't remember that letter because they "never received it".
>
>4.) You claim they didn't run your rebuttal because I threatened you 
>and them in a letter you now say they never received.
>
I knew that QST did not receive the threat letter because I phoned Paul 
Pagel. 
 
>Which story is the truth Rich? 
>
>1.) Did they receive the letter, and not run your rebuttal because of 
>my threat?  
>
>2.) Did they not receive the letter, and you mistakenly thought they 
>did when you accused them of not running your rebuttal because of 
>that letter?
>
none of the above  

Tom --  the 8877 I tested this morning - that failed in an AL-1500 - has 
gold-sputtering leakage.   Is it still your position that the AL-1500 
needs no VHF parasitic suppressor.?   

cheers

-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com