[Amps] Audio BW -- Please just let us operate!!
Vic Rosenthal
vic at rakefet.com
Fri Aug 27 14:52:17 EDT 2004
Let me try to move this discussion to a more, er, constructive plane.
A possible solution to the problem of bandwidth vs. quality is to
develop of form of digital audio encoding that employs a data
compression scheme similar to the variable bit rate method that's used
in some forms of mp3 encoding.
The idea is that intelligent data compression can take advantage of
voice characteristics to minimize the data rate necessary to transmit
BC-quality audio.
Since the signal is digital, ultra-high efficiency class-E amplification
could be used. A 1.5 KW digital signal would be potent indeed -- far
more so than a puny 375-watt carrier AM signal.
Of course you guys running BC-610's and SX-28's would have to upgrade
your transmitting and receiving equipment.
Speaking of CW (somebody did), the ARRL proposal mentions that the
bandwidth of a CW signal with 5 ms rise and fall times is about 150 Hz.
Such a signal is good for at least 60 wpm, and since the bandwith
limit for CW is 200 Hz., the Ted McElroys among us can harden up the
keying a bit and go even faster.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
More information about the Amps
mailing list