[Amps] Re: Why price difference/30S1
Gary Smith
wa6fgi at sbcglobal.net
Thu Feb 3 18:10:40 EST 2005
Now here is stable mind.
73
Gary, wa6fgi
----- Original Message -----
From: W2RU - Bud Hippisley
To: amps at contesting.com
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 2:47 PM
Subject: [Amps] Re: Why price difference/30S1
At 18:13 2005-02-03, Jim Isbell, W5JAI wrote:
>Yes, but even though its a collectors item it is cheaper than an
>equivilent "NEW" amp so you get a good amp AND you dont have
>depreciation AND you save $1000 to $1500
Expanding on W9GE's list, here's what I've come up with over the years as to why I might want a newer amp:
1. I want to run the amplifier on 160.
2. I want to run an amplifier on the WARC bands (that allow it) with reasonable tank circuit efficiency.
3. I want the built-in QSK of some of the newer amps.
4. I want to automate the band-switching of the amplifier (for instance, to make sure it's always on the same band as myr transceiver or exciter when I hit the key or the PTT switch).
5. I am bothered by the fact that older amplifiers in the USA were designed against an FCC 1KW CW INPUT limit (versus today's 1.5KW OUTPUT limit).
If none of the above are of concern, a Heath SB-220 is excellent value, in the US$500 - 700 range the last time I looked. I'm sure there are many other brands and models, too -- I just happen to be real familiar with the SB-220, since I still use one.
Bud, W2RU
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
More information about the Amps
mailing list