[Amps] Re: Why price difference/30S1

Gary Smith wa6fgi at sbcglobal.net
Thu Feb 3 18:10:40 EST 2005


Now here is stable mind.
73
Gary, wa6fgi
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: W2RU - Bud Hippisley 
  To: amps at contesting.com 
  Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 2:47 PM
  Subject: [Amps] Re: Why price difference/30S1


  At 18:13 2005-02-03, Jim Isbell, W5JAI wrote:
  >Yes, but even though its a collectors item it is cheaper than an
  >equivilent "NEW" amp so you get a good amp AND you dont have
  >depreciation AND you save $1000 to $1500

  Expanding on W9GE's list, here's what I've come up with over the years as to why I might want a newer amp:

  1.  I want to run the amplifier on 160.
  2.  I want to run an amplifier on the WARC bands (that allow it) with reasonable tank circuit efficiency.
  3.  I want the built-in QSK of some of the newer amps.
  4.  I want to automate the band-switching of the amplifier (for instance, to make sure it's always on the same band as myr transceiver or exciter when I hit the key or the PTT switch).
  5.  I am bothered by the fact that older amplifiers in the USA were designed against an FCC 1KW CW INPUT limit (versus today's 1.5KW OUTPUT limit).

  If none of the above are of concern, a Heath SB-220 is excellent value, in the US$500 - 700 range the last time I looked.  I'm sure there are many other brands and models, too -- I just happen to be real familiar with the SB-220, since I still use one.

  Bud, W2RU


  _______________________________________________
  Amps mailing list
  Amps at contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


More information about the Amps mailing list