[Amps] Eimac 3500Z Vs. RFParts or Taylor Tubes
Will Matney
craxd1 at ezwv.com
Mon Feb 14 10:40:20 EST 2005
My experience with them has been that when the Chinese version first came
out, they were pure junk. So many people complained and got burned that
they did in fact change them. Now, they are just as good, or if not better
than the Eimac was. The 3-500ZG (graphite anode) is a pretty good tube and
can take a beating.
Will
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:14:11 -0400, Javier <yv5mbx at arrl.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am curious abt the high street prices of Eimac 3500Z tubes against
> Chineese Version.
>
> Is my understanding that chineese tubes get not as hot as Eimac and
> provide abt 100 watts of extra power. If I am correct is the price
> difference based upon tube´s longvity?
>
> Thanks,
> Javier
> yv5mbx
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.880 (20040928) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.nod32.com
>
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Amps
mailing list