[Amps] Testing a tuner
Tomm Aldridge
KD7QAE at ARRL.NET
Sun Jan 9 16:34:27 EST 2005
My balanced tuner is configured with the motorized roller inductors
(26uH ea) in series mechanically with about a 2" separation. I have the
capacitor split between 2 500pF Henry variables, one of which is almost
always shunting the output of the 24 turn x 4" coax balun on the input
of the tuner. This coupling has not caused me any grief to date. If
you were to make a link coupler I would suggest opposed drives so the
tank L increased or decreased symmetrically around the center where the
link was located. The second motor would be simple enough to add.
Tomm, KD7QAE
Rob & Terri Sherwood wrote:
> If the League is really only using resistive loads, then they could make
> the loads reactive with inductors or capacitors. This would be time
> consuming, but what other option do they have? The balanced L network
> tuners I have tried matched fine into resistors on 20 meters and above,
> but hooking them to a real antenna was another story.
> On the balanced L network tuners, putting a 10 - 100 pF variable
> capacitor on the input solved virtually all my matching limitations.
> What does this imply? In every case the output Z was higher than 50
> ohms because swapping the L network capacitor to the input always made
> the matching worse. So why did converting it to a Pi from an L make
> such an improvement? The balun was always on the transmitter side.
> I am wondering if one could build a modern Matchbox with the following:
> Two roller inductors in line mechanically and driven by a turns counter,
> and the link located in the middle between the two roller inductors.
> Then of course we need a split stator and a dual differential capacitor.
>
> Someone mentioned the issue of coupling between the balanced L network
> coils. If there is too much mutual coupling between the coils, what
> will happen?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
More information about the Amps
mailing list