[Amps] High C out
Will Matney
craxd1 at ezwv.com
Fri Jan 21 13:59:53 EST 2005
John and Vic,
That's what I thought by reading it but never seen anything of a beast
like a L-Pi so I thought it would be wrong to comment. The only other
thing I could think he meant was adding to the tank coil. I guess that
might be done, but I've never seen it used. The best he could really do is
use a dip meter and find where it tuned using one coil.
Will
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:52:24 -0600, W0UN -- John Brosnahan
<shr at swtexas.net> wrote:
> At 12:22 PM 1/21/2005, Dennis12Amplify at aol.com wrote:
>>
>> Will,
>>
>> I believe Chris is talking about converting from a PI network to a
>> Pi-L
>> network. The Pi-L having two levels of impedance matching, and a
>> little more
>> harmonic suppression, than the original Pi network.
>> Thus the original Tune C becomes the middle capacitor of the Pi-L,
>> allowing
>> for a larger value of C, and the plate C is now the new Tune C.
>> Also, If his tune cap is already backed all the way out, he needs LESS
>> inductance in the tank to tune it, not more... Therefore he would be
>> SPREADING
>> the coil turns apart, or removing a turn, or moving the tap towards
>> less turns,
>> any of which would result in less inductance in the tank circuit....
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dennis O.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 1/21/05 11:49:21 AM Central Standard Time,
>> craxd1 at ezwv.com writes:
>>
>> A 300 nH coil (0.3 uH) is not very much. Assuming this would be the
>> tank
>> coil, the 10 meter end being the largest in size, one might just
>> squeeze
>> the coils together to raise the inductance enough to bring it in tune.
>> If
>> not, adding 1 to 2 turns of the same size wire, and same diameter would
>> most likely do it. A dip meter would be easier to use to find the exact
>> placing of the tap on the coil if it has taps. According to the way the
>> tube is ran and tube type, some at a higher frequencies dont need a
>> tune C
>> in order to tune correctly because the tubes output C is high enough
>> and
>> takes care of it. In the amps I've seen this way, a load C was all that
>> was used.
>
>
> Actually it is the other way around. The pi-L normally refers to moving
> the
> output cap (loading) to a higher impedance point and matching this
> intermediate impedance to 50 ohms with the L network. This provides
> additional harmonic suppression as well as reducing the amount of
> capacitance required for this "shared" capacitor, shared between the
> output of the pi section and the input of the L section. Downside is
> that the load capacitor requires a higher voltage rating because the
> impedance is no longer 50 ohms but a few times higher.
>
> What Chris is trying to do is the exact opposite. He is trying to move
> the
> Tune capacitor to a lower impedance point by adding a new L between
> the original network and the anode of the tube. I guess this could be
> called
> an L-pi network. Since the impedance is now lower at this new point
> you need more C for the tune cap -- and that may allow a capacitor with
> a higher minimum C to be used.
>
> So this new inductor is to be placed between the TUBE and the TUNE
> capacitor.
>
> I have used the 3CPX5000A7s in pulse mode at 50 MHz for wind profiling
> and that is what I did. The average observer would just think my plate
> lead
> was pretty darn long. But in reality it is an inductor that is part of
> an L
> network that steps down the impedance so that the Tune cap can resonate
> the circuit without running into a minimum capacitance issue. The tune
> cap
> is now "shared" between this L network on the tube side and the pi
> network
> for matching the new impedance to the output impedance. In my case I
> also used another inductor at the output, once again a long lead and not
> a "real" coil, so my matching is technically called an L-pi-L network, I
> guess.
>
> Some of this effect exists in any case just due to stray inductance in
> the
> leads, but this is increasing the inductance to a value high enough to
> make L
> networks that provide useful impedance stepping.
>
> --John W0UN
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.880 (20040928) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.nod32.com
>
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Amps
mailing list