[Amps] Happy birthday to...

[S. J. Blackwell]

A weak comparison--Consider transients and reactance. Some weak comparison 
with transients, but reactance??
73, Sam


>From: "Will Matney" <craxd1 at verizon.net>
>Reply-To: craxd1 at verizon.net
>To: amps at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [Amps] Happy birthday to...
>Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:59:37 -0500
>
>Speaking of George, did you know that the same formulas for ohms law, are 
>the same in hydraulics? The only difference is the terms are changed. 
>Current = flow, and voltage = pressure. Resistance I'd say is still a 
>resistance like placing a needle valve in line, or changing a pipe/hose 
>size. I'm not sure what the term for resistance would be in hydraulics 
>(restriction?) now since I've not done any of that in probably 7 years? I 
>figure that George seen this in hydraulics, and converted it over to 
>electricity when he seen they worked the same. Hydraulics formulas were out 
>way before electrical. The US military used to teach electronics by using 
>the water theory I think they called it. They compared how water acted 
>being pumped through pipes as compared to a generator pushing electrons 
>through a wire, tube = valve, etc..
>
>Best,
>
>Will
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>
>On 3/16/06 at 7:40 AM Bill Turner wrote:
>
> >George Ohm, born on this day in 1789, who made it possible for us to
> >get in the internet and argue over stuff. :-)
> >
> >73, Bill W6WRT
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Amps mailing list
> >Amps at contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps