[Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7

[Gary Schafer]

What if the tube in question is a 4CX1000 and not a 4-1000?

Why not just spell it out like most of the world is used to seeing rather
than trying to be cryptic or do short hand. More letters from the keyboard
aren't that expensive. :>)

73
Gary  K4FMX

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Robert B. Bonner
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:52 PM
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7
> 
> 3X3 = 3CX3000A7, 4X5 = 4CX5000*, 4X1 = 4-1000A, 4X3 = 4CX3000A.
> 
> The correct Pronunciation is Three By Three.
> 
> Little tubes are referred to like "a couple three fives" 35 = 3-500Z's.
> But
> mostly are ignored by the big tube crowd like they don't exist.
> 
> However it is acceptable when piling up stacks of smaller tubes to use
> AMPLIFIER names as referencing the PILE.  An SX refers to a pair of 8877.
> 
> Ah, those crafty yanks....
> 
> >From a previous lesson by the Professor, Pair of 4X1's = MOJO...
> 
> BOB DD
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Peter Chadwick
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 8:53 AM
> To: John; amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] schamatis 160 meter amp using 3cx3000a7
> 
> What do you mean by "160m amp using the 3x3 "?
> What is a "3x3"?
> 73
> Peter G3RZP
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps