[Amps] w1qwj 6m Amp + W9QQ smps

[Carl]

With 2 tubes the input impedance will be halved.

An easy way to do the output is to have a fairly close wound coil and 
the Tune cap about 3/4 meshed. For 2 tubes, stretch the coil a bit and 
see where the cap winds up. Adjust the coil and cap until you have full 
output and with sufficient extra range on the cap. There is no need for 
rocket science Q calculations, most anything within reason works fine. 
Ive had no problem converting several LK-800A amps to 6M and they are a 
3 holer.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Decker" <kg7hf at comcast.net>
To: <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 10:20 PM
Subject: [Amps] w1qwj 6m Amp + W9QQ smps


>
>
> Hello amp builders.
>
>
>
> An update and a couple more questions.
>
>
>
> A version of the w9qq power supply is moving forward, not quite at 
> warp speed, but forward none the less. The clock module and clock 
> amplifier section are built up and tested. I'm trying to workout a 
> sane layout for the power mosfets to facilitate decent cooling. #18 HV 
> (2000vdc) wire is on order as is HV teflon tubing for it which should 
> complete the transformer section.
>
>
>
> Maybe when the ps is done, someone local ( southern NH) with an HV 
> scope/probe can help me take a look at how clean/dirty it is?
>
>
>
> Once the power supply is mostly complete, I'll obviously start to 
> focus heavily on the RF deck, but I have done some work. The dentron 
> chassis went through the dishwasher , unfortunately, I wasn't sneaky 
> enough and got caught by the (x) yl who wasn't happy about that. 
> (although I told her that she could always buy me a parts washer)
>
>
>
>
>
> Now for a couple of the questions, so I can think a bit ahead.
>
>
>
> The w1qwj schematic is for a single 3cx800. I'm pretty sure I 
> physically have room for two and would like to set myself up for a 
> later addition of a second one since I don't have a second tube, 
> socket, or chimney right now. What sorts of things change when adding 
> a second tube? I'm guessing input and output impedance. For the 
> untrained, how do i figure out how to compensate for a second tube? 
> Right now I'm just looking for some high level information to get me 
> going in the right direction. Even if it's "don't put a second tube 
> in" type of discussion.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul, kg7hf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>