[Amps] Suggestion.....

[Bob Nielsen]

I agree, but when I used mutt for email, it could be configured to  
have "reply", "reply to all" or "reply to list" which I thought was  
nice.  It is strictly text-based (using curses) and most people  
prefer a graphical email client but I haven't seen anything else  
which had all three choices.

Bob N7XY

On Oct 3, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

>
>
> No, leave it alone.
>
> "Reply to sender" is the default for the MailMan list
> software and goes a long way to preventing the "oops!"
> of an accidental "reply to all."
>
> Most e-mail software includes both "reply" and "reply
> to all" options.  If the list if configured for "reply
> to all" as a default, it eliminates the option to reply
> to the sender without a significant effort to find the
> correct reply address.
>
> 73,
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com
>> [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Dawson
>> Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 1:27 PM
>> To: amps at contesting.com
>> Subject: [Amps] Suggestion.....
>>
>>
>> Can we change this group so when you click "Reply" in your
>> mail client it goes to the
>> group and not to the individual? If it is important enough to
>> post to the group, most likely so is the response.
>>
>> Jim - K9DD
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps at contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps