[Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW

[Alek Petkovic]

At 10:36 PM 9/11/2010, Jim W7RY wrote:
>"I am not saying it is right. I'm just acknowledging that it happens
>and that it is here to stay and none of us are going to stop it"
>
>
>
>Sure you can Alex....
>
>Disqualify them. That will send a message. Simple, easy and effective.
>
>73
>Jim W7RY


What? All of them?

Who's gonna find them all and visit their stations all around the 
world, all on one weekend?

Who's gonna book the flights and pay for the hotels, train tickets 
and taxis to send an inspector to Vladivostock to check on a loud 
station only to have those inside, back off the drive when they hear 
the knock at the door?

Multiply that by several hundred. Its a logistical impossibility.

Take off your policeman hat and leave things be. Things have always 
been that way and they won't change and the PA station is right. This 
thread ain't about Amps any more.

73 from sunny Western Australia
Alek. VK6APK






>--------------------------------------------------
>From: "Alek Petkovic" <vk6apk at bigpond.com>
>Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:50 PM
>To: <amps at contesting.com>
>Cc: <amps at contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>
>>As well as all the other home brew amps that have tubes with handles.
>>
>>2.5kW whether legal or not, is flea power when put against what we
>>hear on the bands during every big contest. Those big amps are not
>>being run at 1500 Watts. They are being run flat out. Power levels of
>>3dB to 6dB over what is legal are being run by many stations around 
>>the world.
>>
>>You can't single out one single station in China and say that it was
>>running contrary to the rules of the contest if you are not going to
>>do the same with all the others.
>>
>>I am not saying it is right. I'm just acknowledging that it happens
>>and that it is here to stay and none of us are going to stop it.
>>
>>It would be far easier to simply change the rules than it would be to
>>police power levels.
>>
>>73, Alek
>>VK6APK
>>
>>At 12:47 PM 9/11/2010, Hsu wrote:
>>>You are right Jim.
>>>But as I know, the most  buyers of  Emtron DX2-5, OM2500/3500 and
>>>THP HL5KFX are  contester :D
>>>           73!Hsu
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry at inbox.com>
>>>To: "Hsu" <hsu4qro at gmail.com>
>>>Cc: "AMPS" <amps at contesting.com>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 12:19 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>>>
>>>
>>> >I don't care if your government allows you to run 100,000 watts Hsu....
>>> >
>>> > The CONTEST rules say... 1500 watts or the power your 
>>> regulations > allow.
>>> > Whichever is LOWER!
>>> >
>>> > Do you understand Hsu?
>>> >
>>> > 73
>>> > Jim W7RY
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --------------------------------------------------
>>> > From: "Hsu" <hsu4qro at gmail.com>
>>> > Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 7:18 PM
>>> > To: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry at inbox.com>
>>> > Cc: <amps at contesting.com>
>>> > Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>>> >
>>> >> Chinese  regulation is below 500W, but in contest , the
>>>club  station  can
>>> >> apply more power  to SRRC.
>>> >>          73!Hsu
>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >> From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry at inbox.com>
>>> >> To: "AMPS" <amps at contesting.com>
>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 10:29 AM
>>> >> Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> Is China allowed 2.5 KW?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Jim W7Ry
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> From: "Larry K4AB" <larry.k4ab at gmail.com>
>>> >>> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:21 PM
>>> >>> To: "Hsu" <hsu4qro at gmail.com>
>>> >>> Cc: <amps at contesting.com>; <ham_amplifiers at yahoogroups.com>
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Was that 2.5KW on the output meter?  No wonder B7P was so loud!
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 73,
>>> >>>> Larry K4AB
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 2010/11/8 Hsu <hsu4qro at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> http://www.56.com/u40/v_NTYxNjg5MzM.html
>>> >>>>> http://www.56.com/u73/v_NTYxNzEyNTQ.html
>>> >>>>> http://www.56.com/u78/v_NTYxNzM3MjM.html
>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>> Amps mailing list
>>> >>>>> Amps at contesting.com
>>> >>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> Amps mailing list
>>> >>>> Amps at contesting.com
>>> >>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -----
>>> >>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> >>>> Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3244 - Release 
>>> Date: >>>> 11/08/10
>>> >>>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Amps mailing list
>>> >>> Amps at contesting.com
>>> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> -----
>>> >> No virus found in this message.
>>> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> >> Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3245 - Release Date: 11/08/10
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Amps mailing list
>>>Amps at contesting.com
>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>>http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk
>>http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6ap
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Amps mailing list
>>Amps at contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>>
>>-----
>>No virus found in this message.
>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3245 - Release Date: 11/08/10
>
>
>http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk
>http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6ap
>