[Amps] 3CX1000A7

Roger (sub1) sub1 at rogerhalstead.com
Fri Nov 19 02:23:42 PST 2010


On 11/17/2010 6:49 PM, Carl wrote:
> Harmonic and spurious attenuation rules are stricter there. Easy to 
> meet with a stub or LPF.
True, but if you look at the tank circuit running a pair isn't is about 
the same as Palstar uses.
Alpha uses a 4CX1500B for the legal limit out with a conventional pin 
net, or Pi-L.
There are a number of 2-meter amps including the 2002A that *suggest* 
stubs or a network on the output.
It appears the Palstar 2-meter amp uses a pair of tubes in the same type 
of circuit the 2002A uses although they use the Russian Tetrode 
(4CX-800) instead of the 3CX800.

I don't see anything in the circuit compared to other legal limit 
6-meter amps that would keep it from certification unless it'd be the 
tubes themselves.

73

Roger (K8RI).
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger (sub1)" 
> <sub1 at rogerhalstead.com>
> To: "Carl" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
> Cc: <amps at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7
>
>
>> On 11/16/2010 9:37 PM, Carl wrote:
>>> Because it doesnt meet FCC specs
>> In what way?  Just never approved yet?
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Roger (K8RI)
>>>
>>> Carl
>>> KM1H
>>
>
>



More information about the Amps mailing list