[Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?

[Carl]

Ive done it a few times using 2 suppressors in a 4 tube amp where each tube 
was contributing 100-300W and it seemed fine even on 10M. The tubes were GG 
1625's and 813's.

OTOH a L-Pi had to be used for 10M and I dont know if it was just due to the 
tubes output C or the presence of the configuration creating its own 
problems plus the tubes C.

Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Waters" <mikewate at gmail.com>
To: <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 7:28 PM
Subject: [Amps] Why always one parasitic suppressor per tube?


> I'm layout out a 160m legal limit AB1 amplifier design using two parallel
> 833-C tubes, and a thought occurred to me: Why are two parasitic
> suppressors always needed (one for each tube)?
>
> Of course, it's not like the cost for an extra suppressor is going to
> matter. It would just be easier in this application to use just one. (long
> story).
>
> 73, Mike
> www.w0btu.com
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1430 / Virus Database: 2639/5616 - Release Date: 02/19/13
>