[Amps] S/S Amp's

[Fuqua, Bill L]

  Most hams today can't tune SSB clearly.
AM always sounds right. Perhaps we should have SSB reduced carrier rather than 
suppressed carrier. Another point, DSB occupies same bandwidth as AM. 
  You could receive DSB or AM by detecting, using bfo and SSB filter,  only one sideband but with the loss
of 3dB signal to noise ratio compared to receiving it with synchronous detector.
73
Bill wa4lav

________________________________________
From: Amps [amps-bounces at contesting.com] on behalf of Joe Subich, W4TV [lists at subich.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:29 PM
To: amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] S/S Amp's

For the same reason they spam other bands with ESSB, IM products,
keyclicks, splatter and/or full carrier AM - because they can and
the rules against stupidity, and bad operating practices either do
not exist or are not enforced.


73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 9/12/2013 12:14 PM, qrv at kd4e.com wrote:
> Why are Hams still rf-spamming 160 & 80m with AM carriers
> when a DSB suppressed-carrier signal is just as good, uses
> less power, and may be sync-detected to remove flutter, etc?
>
> I know, I know, ... never mind ... sigh.
>
>> Jim said;
>>
>> "It sure would be nice to just rectify the 120vac from the wall plug,
>> with
>> or without any isolation xfmr"
>>
>> It's already in production.
>>
>> Not quite what you're after but... <http://www.k7dyy.com/>
>> http://www.k7dyy.com/
>>
>> David G4ZOW
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps