[Amps] [Bulk] Re: 572B - News?

[Carl]

I disagree about the Svetlana 572B and repeated underated problems led to 
its being discontinued. Perhaps they rated it at some imaginary IVS 160W 
instead of  ICAS commercial use. All used a ceramic base AFIK.

Svetlana also fraudently changed the GU-74B from a 600W PD to 800W when they 
scrubbed and relabled it as the 4CX800A.

Of course any 572B will be loafing in a 30L1 as it is still running as a 
811A. Its a good swap in the Ameritron AL-811's as Amertron did themselves 
as the AL-811HD.

Ive had a pair of Svetlanas in an AM modulator running fine at 1600V for 
over 20 years as 811A's; and another pair really loafing at 900V in a Clegg 
Zeus.

A single 813 1954 QST cover TX will be getting another pair once I finish 
the restoration. I have maybe 8 remaining from a bulk buy near the end.

The T-160L was a Taylor designation that was never produced in any quantity 
and intended as an AM modulator and sold as a 572A by UE and 572B by Cetron 
with the T-160L marking also included for several years.

UE then built the 572B for Cetron who couldnt keep up with orders; UE = 
round top, Cetron = shouldered top. The reverse was also true.  All other US 
branded 572B's were made by the two actual manufacturers.
The 160W was always an ICAS rating.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave" <d.gow at frontier.com>
To: "'Al Kozakiewicz'" <akozak at hourglass.com>; <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] [Bulk] Re: 572B - News?


> The service bulletin was in the bias system for the FL-2100B.   Improper
> bias triggered instability.  There were not RF related changes.The FL-200Z
> has a different bias system but I don't remember if it fixed the problem.
> The problem does not exist in the 30L1 or the SB-200 .All the details are 
> on
> the Web.  I Svetlana's plate dissipation rating is 160 watts, just like 
> the
> 572B.  Yes, the plates are smaller but they are also thicker and are made 
> of
> graphite like the original T160 (original nomenclature for what became the
> 572B.  I have a set of original ceramic base 572B in my 30L1 and they have
> worked perfectly for over 5 years of daily use and the amplifier is stable
> on all bands.  I wish I had bought a spare set back when they were current
> production.
>
> Dave
> W7VM
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Al 
> Kozakiewicz
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 10:56 AM
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Amps] 572B - News?
>
> Plus, if I recall, there was a service bulletin on the 2100 (not sure it 
> it
> applied to the Z variant) regarding the use of the Svetlana tubes.  The 
> amp
> needed a modification (probably to the parasitic suppression?) to use that
> tube.
>
> Al
> AB2ZY
> ________________________________________
> From: Amps <amps-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of Carl
> <km1h at jeremy.qozzy.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 1:03 PM
> To: David Harmon; 'Marcelo Cabral'; amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?
>
> The Svetlana works OK but has a smaller anode and less dissipation. They
> havent been made in several years now.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Harmon" <k6xyz at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "'Marcelo Cabral'" <py1kr.marcelo at gmail.com>; <amps at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 12:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?
>
>
>> Marcelo.....
>> Try to find some 572-B made by Svetlana.......they are much better
>> quality.
>> I have had several sets of them and I prefer them over the Chinese
>> mfgd tubes.
>>
>>
>> 73
>>
>> David Harmon
>> K6XYZ
>> Sperry, OK
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Marcelo
>> Cabral
>> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 11:18 AM
>> To: amps at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?
>>
>> Hi, Carl!
>>
>> Good news at the end!
>> Sincerely, I will try a MP pair of these new tubes after January, but
>> I haven't big expectations about their reliability.
>> But, if them survive at least one year, I must be finished the others
>> projects and be able for start this mod for GI7B. For today, I'll buy
>> some GI7B's from UR4LL, must be useful in a near future.
>> Thanks everyone, hope to meet everybody in CQWW CW soon.
>>
>> Marcelo - PY1KR
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Carl [mailto:km1h at jeremy.qozzy.com]
>> Sent: sexta-feira, 7 de novembro de 2014 14:52
>> To: Marcelo Cabral; amps at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] 572B - News?
>>
>> RF Parts will be taking new 572B orders in Jan 2015, Id rather wait
>> than hack up a perfectly good amp for an inferior tube.
>> http://www.rfparts.com/tubes/tubes-572b.html
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8529 - Release Date:
>> 11/07/14
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8529 - Release Date: 11/07/14
>