[Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper

OZ1AXG Flam oz1axg.nospam at dxmail.dk
Thu Sep 25 02:46:23 EDT 2008


Hi Joe

Yes, i know, there are many odds againt it beeing a perfect antenna. But 
that how it is with this super limited space. But what im going for is some 
vertical radiation, to get some low angale radiation as alternative to the 
dipol who has some limitations when it comes to DX.

--
OZ1AXG Flam


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe, aa4nn" <aa4nn at earthlink.net>
To: "OZ1AXG Flam" <oz1axg.nospam at dxmail.dk>; "K9AY" <k9ay at k9ay.com>
Cc: <antennaware at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Antennaware] 160 meter 3/8 wire, steel or copper


> Dr OM Flam,
> Not only does the tower affect your INV L, now you have
> let us know of the 80m slopers and another 160m antenna.
> These wire antennas have drastically more influence on
> your INV L than you ever thought the tower would have.
> In the end you may get a pretty good match with low
> SWR on your INV L but your radiation pattern will be
> so convoluted you'll never know where your signal is
> going.  hi
> 73, Joe, aa4nn
>
>>Yes the distance to the tower has influenced the matching a lot ... 
>>besides
>>the 22.5 tower theres also two 80 meter sloopers and 1 inverted V 160 
>>meter
>>dipole - altogether making the antenna electrical longer. Its a compromise
>>to get room for all the stuff up there :=) The 60 KHz difference in
>>resonanse frequence, to the calculated values, might be explained by all
>>this extra "top loading" capacity.
>>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.2/1689 - Release Date: 9/24/2008 
6:51 PM




More information about the Antennaware mailing list