[Antennaware] Version 6 EZNEC

Gary Myers garymyers at powerc.net
Wed Jun 10 10:15:35 EDT 2015

and have been using AutoEZ as well with the help of Dan and Greg ('8WWV)


-----Original Message----- 
From: Gary Myers
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:12 AM
To: Guy Olinger K2AV ; AntennaWare
Subject: Re: [Antennaware] Version 6 EZNEC

I've been using EZNEC6+ for a couple of weeks now - no issues whatsoever.
Have been a considerable amount of time into it modeling monobanders both by
themselves and in stacks, interactions between bands and am now modeling the
effects of guy wires to try to come up with a reasonable solution re changes
in FB vs. cost.

I posted a note - last week I believe, here... still zero replies! Does that
not bode well for the use of these tools? That they're mostly used for
academics and not to provide real solutions? Seems as such. Posted here and
on the EZNEC Yahoo group and other than 1 reply I've not heard a word.


-----Original Message----- 
From: Guy Olinger K2AV
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 10:03 AM
To: AntennaWare
Subject: [Antennaware] Version 6 EZNEC

Just got v6 Pro/4 installed, which has NEC 4.2 invoked with an extended
accuracy ground (GN3).

Had some problems which W7EL fixed in 6.03, rather quickly actually.

I've run some above ground models and compared v5 high accuracy with v6
extended (160m L over FCP) and seen differences of only a hundredth of a dB
or two in double precision engines.

That's just quantification noise methinks.

Careful compares on some seriously ground involved problem models to come.
Have to get caught up on current correspondence first.

Looking forward to trying out AutoEZ but first need to figure out how to
pay for it with a credit card.

How's anyone else getting along with V6 EZNEC?

73, Guy K2AV

Sent via Gmail Mobile on my iPhone
Antennaware mailing list
Antennaware at contesting.com

Antennaware mailing list
Antennaware at contesting.com

More information about the Antennaware mailing list