[CCF] RE 3830 is good... BUT....
Jukka Tarvainen
tarjuk at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 06:46:18 PDT 2009
>[CCF] 3830 is good... BUT....
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>
>... please also do not forget to send your logs to www.sactest.net
Hello!
This happened to me.
I sent my log first via email to saccw at nrrl.no
Then I see this post above in CCF list and uploaded my log to sactest.net.
Then I got email from sacsupport at ssa.se. I think it came from sactest.net.
>Hello fellow contester,
>
>Thank you very much for your participation in Scandinavian Activity
Contest - 2009.
>
>This log have already been received!!
>
>Your contest log is not accepted!
>
>
>You obviously need to do some change(s) in your Cabrillo log, before it
will be accepted by the SAC Log Processing Robot.
klip...
My result is in claimed score page.
I try to find fault in my cabrillo file created by N1MM. Only difference to
example in sactest page is that qso data line is a bit different:
(line from my log, call changed)
QSO: 14000 CW 2009-09-20 1154 OH4MFA 599 0405 XY1ABC 599
0172
QSO: 14000 CW 2009-09-19 1748 7S3A 599 1 4K6GF 599
116 0
(line from log example in sactest)
Serial number seems to be in different position. Do I need to change all qso
lines?
73
Jukka OH4MFA
SOAB QRP
More information about the CCF
mailing list