[CCF] [TOEC] SAC CW - Low Power and QRP results Europe (compared to HP Unassisted)

[Mats Strandberg]

Timo,

This could be a valid point, but still does not make me convinced when
comparing Top-10 LP Unassisted with Top-10 HP Assisted.

Three or four of the LP unassisted Top-10 would also have qualified on the
Top-10 HP Assisted category.

The HP Assisted cateogry in SAC CW 2011 was a hornets nest... with serious
competition and many big guns using "a kW" and both skimmers and clusters.

To get the amount of mults that some of the LP unassisted achieved (with
100 Watts and no assiatance) is a "true achievement"....

Compare also LP Unassisted with HP Assisted to make up your minds.

73 de Mats LRR

2011/11/5 Timo Klimoff <timo.klimoff at dnainternet.net>

> >
> >It does not require a degree in Rocket Science to make a quick analysis
> and
> >realize that many of the LP scores are unrealistically high both with
> >regards to QSOs and multipliers, compared to the same unassisted category
> >in High Power.
>
> Dear Mats,
>
> for me this looks more like category activity issue, not power cheating.
> The
> winner of HP unassisted class CR6K operated only 11 hours - less than half
> (and was a winner with clear margin)! Unassisted HP class has the lowest
> level of competition now after establishing assisted class.
>
> 73, Timo OH1NOA
>
> _______________________________________________
> TOEC mailing list
> TOEC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/toec
>