SWL Software
k3lr
k3lr at telerama.pgh.pa.us
Thu Dec 31 14:42:51 EST 1992
I have a work application that needs computer control of the Icom
R-7000 receiver. Does anyone know of a software package that
will do this? I've passed up the ads for this type of stuff
until now! If you are using a package, I'd like to hear
your comments.
73,
Tim K3LR
>From n6tv at vnet.ibm.com Tue Dec 1 01:31:02 1992
From: n6tv at vnet.ibm.com (Robert A. Wilson)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:26 2003
Subject: More claimed scores
Message-ID: <mailman.7.1043801126.8266.cq-contest at contesting.com>
CQ WW CW
---------
P40W(W2GD) 5700/150/423 = 9.7M (80m antenna blew down mid-contest)
P40X(N6BT) 2838/33/111 = 1,213,776 Single-band 10
N6UR(KR6X) 2518/156/366 = 3.7M
N6TV 1044/131/234 = 1.06M 20 hours
SS Phone
--------
N6UR(KR6X) 1973/77
CQ WW Phone
-----------
N6UR(+KR6X, 2 other ops) 1979/153/402 = 3.0M Multi-single
73,
Bob, N6TV
>From gjk at hogpa.ho.att.com Tue Dec 1 07:57:26 1992
From: gjk at hogpa.ho.att.com (Gerald J Kersus +1 908 949 9511)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:26 2003
Subject: More Scores
Message-ID: <9212011257.AA16643 at hogpc.ho.att.com>
Copied the following on packet last night:
W3LPL M/M
Band Qs Zs Cs
160 89 18 50
80 602 28 96
40 1622 38 144
20 1718 39 157
15 1440 37 152
10 1011 36 139
----------------------------
6482 196 738
KY3N M/M
3109 Qs 170 Zs 604 Cs ===> 6.87M
N3RS M/S
Band Qs Zs Cs
160 44 15 41
80 138 26 82
40 1038 36 137
20 850 39 145
15 685 37 137
10 734 33 132
----------------------------
3488 186 674 ====> 8.686M
K2SG M/S
2445 Qs 153 Zs 489 Cs ===> 4.5M
WW2Y M/S
2786 Qs 175 Zs 595 Cs ===> 6.159M
WR3E SOA
1923 Qs 171 Zs 585 Cs ===> 4.158M
W1GD SOA
1023 Qs 144 Zs 428 Cs ===> 1.66M
K3ND SOA
909 Qs 145 Zs 429 Cs ===> 1.49M
N2LT SO
Band Qs Zs Cs
160 25 9 16
80 187 19 55
40 761 32 102
20 410 35 89
15 744 31 99
10 647 31 85
----------------------------
2774 157 446 ===> 4.9M
AK3Z (K2PH op) SO
1587 Qs 142 Zs 385 Cs ===> 2.37M
>From npalomba at uu2.psi.com Tue Dec 1 08:30:34 1992
From: npalomba at uu2.psi.com (Nicholas Palomba Crystal Computer Systems Inc.)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: Please add user to contest mailing...
Message-ID: <9212011330.AA05109 at ccsi.com>
Trey, Could you please add a user to the contest mail group? His
address is: tad at ssc.com
Thanks,
-Nick KA1NIP
***Still waiting for my new call
>From mraz at maverick.aud.alcatel.com Tue Dec 1 11:11:09 1992
From: mraz at maverick.aud.alcatel.com (Kris Mraz)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: contest exchanges
Message-ID: <9212011711.AA07387 at maverick.aud.alcatel.com>
Eric, K3NA, suggests passing names around as part of a contest exchange. Seems
to me everyone will become Ed for the contest. "... ur 5NNED" "QSL ur 5NNED".
On the dark side, this kind of name exchanging could lead to the spread
of an insideous virus. Can't happen? Who would have thought five years ago
that a computer could catch a virus? Maybe an uncommon name such as Filbert
could trigger a dormant mole virus. When that name is entered into the contest
log the virus would go through and quietly corrupt your log; unknown to you
until you find your call listed in the "disqualified" column in the results.
[BTW, The above is tongue-in-cheek]
Here's another contest idea that you'll never see: In the first 24 hours work
as many stations as you can, for a point apiece. In the second 24 hours work
as many of the stations you worked the first 24 hours, for 5 points apiece!
That is, you intentionally work dupes. If its not a dupe, only one point.
This would certainly encourage people to work both days of the contest.
Kris, AA5UO '~ ~`
mraz at rockdal.aud.alcatel.com L
J
>From skitch at NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL Tue Dec 1 13:06:27 1992
From: skitch at NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL (M. Squicciarini)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: DX Bulletin OPDX #88 November 30, 1992
Message-ID: <9212011806.AA00221 at NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL>
The Ohio/Penn Dx PacketCluster
DX Bulletin No. 088 (OPDX.088)
November 30, 1992
Editor Tedd Mirgliotta, KB8NW
Provided by BARF-80 BBS Cleveland, Ohio
Online at 216-237-8208 14400/9600/2400/1200/300 8/N/1
Thanks to the Northern Ohio Amateur Radio Society, Northern Ohio DX
Association, Ohio/Penn PacketCluster Network, ARRL, K1ER, WB3JFS, WK3N
K8MFO, W8XD and K8YSE for the following DX information.
5X, UGANDA (UPDATE). It has been reported that Mario, 5X5MB, was heard
stating Dr. Fred Ruppert, 5X5WR, will be coming next week. He also
stated there is a possibility that Baldur, DJ6SI, may accompany Dr.
Ruppert to operate CW from Uganda. UPDATE: Just before print, DJ6SI was
active as 5X5WR on 21025 kHz around 1930z.
D6, COMOROS. D68GA has been quite active on 28500 kHz around 1600z
looking for west coast stations, but still working east coast stations.
Activity has also been on 21295 kHz around 2000z and 24950 kHz between
1630 to 1800z. QSL via N6ZV.
KH5 AND KH5K, PALMYRA ISLAND AND KINGMAN REEF. Pete, N0AFW, and some of
the operators from the FO0CI group, are planning a trip to be active in
the last week of February or the first week of March. There will be
approximately 12 operators and they plan to be active approximately 9
days. Their plan is to be active from both location at the same time.
P5, NORTH KOREA. A station signing P5DTG has been active around 21023
and 28018 kHz between 2200 to 0230z. The operator stated to QSL via
OK1DTG. Reported beam headings are from the right direction and JA DXers
are reporting the signal is coming from the north. WFWL! If you remember
Josef, OK1DTG, was in P5 land and operated as OK1DTG/P5 during April
12-24. Josef claimed he has written permission by the military and was
only allowed to operate 40 meters CW with 10 watts. As far as we know
his operation is still no good for DXCC credit.
T5, SOMALI. It was reported that INDEXA mentioned a station will become
active as T5CB during December 18 thru January 2. QSL to: P.O. Box 1311,
Buena Vista, CO 81211.
VU7CVP QSL CARDS. Reports are coming in stating turn around for QSL cards
are anywhere from 27 to 29 days. Congratulations to Chitra and Vidi for
putting on a rare location and the fast turn around of cards.
BRAZILIAN POSTAGE RATES. Leo, PP1CZ, a well know dxpeditioner of ZZ0TA,
PU0F, PP0F etc fame, has reported the following: Many Brazil Dx'ers are
asking for $2 American to return an airmail card. As of this date, an
airmail return is about $1.20 American. It fluctuates up and down from
about $1 to $1.50. The actual cost today is about 10,300 Cruzeiros. Leo
advises that one IRC will buy an airmail stamp to anywhere in the world
from Brazil and this is the preferred method for QSLing. Donations in
currency over and above that are always appreciated but not required since
one IRC is sufficient. He also recommends not using Brazil postage stamps
because the inflation rate is such that stamps purchased one day are not
sufficient the next day. The inflation rate is 30% or greater! The
Brazil bureau is only working for QSLS going into Brazil. They do not
have outgoing service. Leo sends his cards to a friend in Germany who
puts them into the bureau system there.
DXCC NEWS. It was announced this week by the ARRL Awards Comittee that
they voted unanimously to accept recommendations from the DXAC (DX
Advisory Committee) to add Croatia, Slovenia and Bosnia-Hercegovina to
the DXCC Countries List. Croatia and Slovenia are added for contacts made
26th May 1991 and after. Bosnia-Hercegovina is added for contacts made
15th October 1991 and after. The DXCC Desk will aceppt cards received
at ARRL Headquarters after 1st January 1993. Cards received before 1st
January 1993 will be returned without action. The Awards Committee gave
no reason why Macedonia was not added, but only it will remain under
study.
THE SECOND ANNUAL OPDX/NODXA DX SURVEY.
Here is your chance to be counted. Deadline will be January 31, 1993,
with results in February. The questions of the survey will deal with:
1) The DXer of the year. This is a DXer who you thought was outstanding
in operating and handling the pile-ups from their DXpedition.
2) DXpedition of the Year (Group and Indivdual). Choose the best and most
well organized DXpedition that met the needs of the DX community.
3) The 30 Most Wanted Countries. Choose your 30 most wanted countries.
4) OPTION: Your personal comments about DXing in 1992.
5) OPTION: Questions for PacketCluster Sysops.
Please use the ballot below. Votes will only be accepted in the
following format below.
____________________________________________________________________
Your | DXer of the Year| DXpedition of the| DXpedition of the
Callsign | (Person) | Year by a person | Year by a group
and QTH | | |
____________________________________________________________________
CHOICE YOUR MOST WANTED COUNTRIES. (Please list only 30 of your most
wanted countries. List CW and SSB modes separately. (Digital modes optional)
CW - AB,CD,EF
SSB - GH,IJ
DM - none
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Text Any Lenght)
_____________________________________________________________________
* Just Fill-in The Blanks And Send It To:
SP KB8NW @ WA8BXN.OH.USA.NA
OPDX/NODXA DX Survey
Example Ballot:
____________________________________________________________________
| | |
| | |
____________________________________________________________________
CHOICE YOUR MOST WANTED COUNTRIES. (Please list only 30 of your most
wanted countries. List CW and SSB modes separately. (Digital modes optional)
CW -
SSB -
DM -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Text Any Lenght)
I think DXing in 1992 was..........
_____________________________________________________________________
OPTIONAL QUESTIONS FOR PACKETCLUSTER SYSOPS ONLY!
1. What is the call sign and QTH of your Cluster?
(Please list frequencies.)
2. Is your Cluster system represented by a club and/or network?
(Please list Club and Network.)
3. How many users do you average daily on the cluster?
4. Does your Cluster receive the OPDX Bulletin? (How?)
5. Do you have access to InterNet, BitNet or Compuserve?
(Please list addresses.)
Excerpts and distribution of The OPDX Bulletin are granted as long as
OPDX/BARF80 receive credit. To contribute DX info, call BARF-80 BBS
online at 216-237-8208 14400/9600/2400/1200/300 and leave a message with
the Sysop or send InterNet Mail to: aq474 at cleveland.freenet.edu or send
BitNet Mail to: aq474%cleveland.freenet at cunyvm or send PRODIGY Mail to:
DFJH48A or send a message via packet to KB8NW @ WA8BXN.OH.USA.NA
73 -- marty -- nr3z skitch at nadc.navy.mil
>From RJA at utrc.utc.com Tue Dec 1 14:04:31 1992
From: RJA at utrc.utc.com (RICH)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: K1KI M/S CQWW CW
Message-ID: <01GRSYG3E84Y0015CC at utrcgw.utc.com>
Here is the K1KI M/S score for CQWW CW:
51 / 13 / 35
304 / 26 / 92
1054 / 36 / 134
587 / 38 / 144
614 / 36 / 133
762 / 33 / 125
----------------
3372 / 182 / 663 ==> 8.3 M
This was a last-minute M/S effort at a station designed for
single-op 1-radio operation (lots of remote coax switches!).
Single yagis on all bands (no stacks), no 80/160 possible
when running Europe on 40, severe interaction on 10/15, hastily
thrown together antenna switching, high SWR on the rotatable
2el 40, uncalibrated rotor boxes. Still had a great time,
great to do a M/S with a good group. Ops: K1KI, K1TO, K1CC,
K5FUV (3/4 time), W1OD (few hours), NJ2L (few hours).
-- Rich K1CC
>From debry at dirac.scri.fsu.edu Tue Dec 1 17:02:45 1992
From: debry at dirac.scri.fsu.edu (Ron DeBry)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: WA6DGX e-mail address
Message-ID: <199212012202.AA17700 at dirac.scri.fsu.edu>
Trey,
The machine I used to recieve mail on has died. Supposedly the system here
was to automatically reroute mail to the new address, but apparently that
has not happened, and a lot of mail has been bouncing. I sent an
UNSUBSCRIBE message for the old address and a SUBSCRIBE message for the new
one to cq-contest-request, but I still haven't gotten any messages for
the past couple of days (suspicious, with the contest last weekend, I
assume there has been traffic).
Once you get your head back together after HC8, please check that my address
for this reflector is :
debry at dirac.scri.fsu.edu
Thanks,
Ron
>From n6tv at vnet.ibm.com Tue Dec 1 15:25:35 1992
From: n6tv at vnet.ibm.com (Robert A. Wilson)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: 9M6NA
Message-ID: <mailman.8.1043801127.8266.cq-contest at contesting.com>
K3NA said:
> 9M6NA had a great signal for a polar path deep SE Asia on 15m. I assume
> it was K6NA??
I think K6NA was at 9Y4H as usual.
Do I get extra points for working 9M6NA, K6NA, and K3NA in the NA
Sprint?
73,
Bob, N6TV
>From MCONATOR at SFOVMIC6.VNET.IBM.COM Tue Dec 1 16:03:38 1992
From: MCONATOR at SFOVMIC6.VNET.IBM.COM (MCONATOR at SFOVMIC6.VNET.IBM.COM)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: Score!
Message-ID: <mailman.9.1043801127.8266.cq-contest at contesting.com>
A very good time was had by all. Good conditions on all but 10m. Europe on
80m was really exciting.
NK7U M/S (QTH - Baker City, Oregon)
160 13 9 10
80 132 20 28
40 461 29 89
20 755 34 103
15 508 33 85
10 163 28 77
ALL 2032 153 392
TOTAL = 3,082,520
Ops: NK7U, NI7T, N7BZ and AA7NX
73,
Mike AA7NX
Michael R. Conatore
mconator at sfovmic6.vnet.ibm.com
IBM Oregon Trading Area
1211 S. W. Fifth Avenue Suite 1000 Portland, Oregon 97204
IBMMAIL USIBM5CZ
A.R.S. AA7NX
>From tanaka at osklns.kek.jp Wed Dec 2 11:30:17 1992
From: tanaka at osklns.kek.jp (Junichi Tanaka)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: WWCW score: KH2S M/S
Message-ID: <9212020230.AA03042 at osklns.kek.ac.jp>
Dear contesters
I just came back from Guam. Hope our effort good enough for new Oceania M/S record.
Here is preliminary score of KH2S, M/S (only merged two .bin file.)
KH2S M/S
op: JA8RUZ JF3EIG, JH4RHF, JH0USD, JI3ERV, JI3OPA, JJ1JMC,
JR4DUW, JR4ISF, JR4PMX, JR7MZC, JR0BQD, KH2D
(too much for M/S, eh??)
band QSO zone country
160 32 8 8
80 118 22 45
40 1304 33 88
20 558 35 98
15 1335 37 102
10 1168 35 85
--------------------------
total 4515 170 426
===> score 7.975M
(old record: KC6AA by YCCC, 5.0M)
Not so bad from Far East, with totally 13hrs power failure !
(but less than US M/S !!)
Please tell me if someone knows other Oceania M/Ss' score, such as H44IO etc...
Dec.2 '92
Jun JH4RHF/KH2S
tanaka at osklns.kek.ac.jp
>From larryt at ateq.com Tue Dec 1 17:01:14 1992
From: larryt at ateq.com (Larry Tyree x 7210)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: 9M6NA
Message-ID: <9212020101.AA23011 at ateq.com>
is not K6NA since he was at 9Y4H.
Tree
>From tanaka at osklns.kek.jp Wed Dec 2 13:45:58 1992
From: tanaka at osklns.kek.jp (Junichi Tanaka)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: 9M6NA
Message-ID: <9212020445.AA03373 at osklns.kek.ac.jp>
>K3NA said:
>
>> 9M6NA had a great signal for a polar path deep SE Asia on 15m. I assume
>> it was K6NA??
>
>I think K6NA was at 9Y4H as usual.
9M6NA is Saty, JE1JKL. He is there at WW CW contest in recent several years.
Please remember he is.
de Jun JH4RHF
ps. Saty told me it was some hundred Q's less than AH3C Oceania S/O
record. Good job.
>From gary.sutcliffe at mixcom.mixcom.com Wed Dec 2 07:34:58 1992
From: gary.sutcliffe at mixcom.mixcom.com (Gary Sutcliffe)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: Multiplier question
Message-ID: <9212020734.aa04410 at mixcom.mixcom.com>
Hi guys!
Sunday a station showed up on 10 meters giving out contest exchanges
and signing P5DTG. This guy has been showing up quite a bit lately.
QRZ DX says it is probably a pirate, but gives the WFWL disclaimer.
I didn't work him, but it got me thinking. Do you claim multiplier
credit if you feel there is a chance he is a pirate?
Actually P5 is not a good example because it won't be on the DXCC list
until the ARRL approves an operation. But what about BY, ZA or YA before
they opened up? What if you and a lot of others worked a 5A last weekend?
The dilemna is that if you don't claim him and your competition does and
the contest commitee does allow it, you lose a multiplier. If you claim
it and it is not allowed, will you be penalized for taking multipliers
you should not?
What do you think?
73 - Gary
--
Gary Sutcliffe - W9XT Unified Microsystems (414) 644-9036
ppvvpp at MIXCOM.COM PO Box 133, Slinger WI 53086
>From mraz at maverick.aud.alcatel.com Wed Dec 2 08:15:58 1992
From: mraz at maverick.aud.alcatel.com (Kris Mraz)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: 10-meter contest
Message-ID: <9212021415.AA07689 at maverick.aud.alcatel.com>
Does anyone plan on operating the 10-meter contest? If so, can you give me some
advice on a winning strategy that has worked in the past?
Kris, AA5UO '~ ~`
mraz at rockdal.aud.alcatel.com L
J
>From alan at dsd.es.com Wed Dec 2 07:50:51 1992
From: alan at dsd.es.com (Alan Brubaker)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: Multiplier question
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Dec 92 07:34:58 CST."
<9212020734.aa04410 at mixcom.mixcom.com>
Message-ID: <9212021450.AA21275 at dsd.ES.COM>
Hi Gary...
I have been operating in the CQWW for 30 years now, and it seems as though
in just about every contest, someone shows up with a weird callsign or an
apparent pirate pops up and stirs up the hordes.
The log that you submit for judging contains a record of the stations that
you made contact with during the contest period. There is no way for you
to know that each and every station that you worked was legitimate or not,
and the chances are good that any illegitimate stations will also show up
in other logs. My opinion is that it is up to the judges to decide whether
or not to discount a particular QSO for whatever reason. What I usually do
is claim a questionable contact (because I believe that we made a valid
exchange) but I will just put a ? next to it on the log page and then let
the judges decide. I do not recall if the rules get very specific about
this, but there is a clause on the summary sheet (which you sign) that
states that you followed the rules.
Alan, K6XO
alan at dsd.es.com
>From reisert at mast.enet.dec.com Wed Dec 2 11:16:53 1992
From: reisert at mast.enet.dec.com (Jim -- DTN 223-5747 -- MLO5-2/13A 02-Dec-1992 1120)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: CQWW CW M/M Scores
Message-ID: <9212021616.AA04837 at us1rmc.bb.dec.com>
CQWW 1992 N2RM CW M/M
BAND Q Z C
160 101 18 54
80 690 30 98
40 1552 37 144
20 1737 39 154
15 1690 37 152
10 1201 35 140
-------------------------
6971 196 742 => 19,098,618
oprs N2RM,N4HY,KA2AEV,WA2STM,KZ2S,N2AA,K2TW,K3UA,KR2J,W2RQ,WM2H,KB2BF
Call: K1AR (at K1EA) Country: United States
Mode: CW Category: Multi Multi
BAND QSO QSO PTS PTS/QSO ZONES COUNTRIES
160 108 262 2.43 16 59
80 741 2071 2.79 29 108
40 1916 5636 2.94 37 142
20 1769 5131 2.90 39 157
15 1614 4724 2.93 37 154
10 1136 3220 2.83 35 138
---------------------------------------------------
Totals 7284 21044 2.89 193 758 => 20,012,844
Operators: K1MM, K1MEM, K1AR, W1RM, K1EA, K1GQ
AD1C M/M (from Warner Hill in Derry, NH, ex-K1ST)
Q Z C D
160 49 12 31 2
80 510 19 81 18
40 1311 35 119 65
20 1512 39 148 83
15 1331 36 139 21
10 897 34 121 19
ALL 5610 175 639 208
CQWW Score: 13,098,074
Operators: AD1C, K1FWE, K1MNS, NX1H, NX1P, NV1J,
K1ZYW, K1TWF, KT1O, NW1U, NX1G
>From sellington at mail.ssec.wisc.edu Wed Dec 2 11:14:56 1992
From: sellington at mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: more WW CW (what else?)
Message-ID: <mailman.10.1043801127.8266.cq-contest at contesting.com>
On the hot coax switch question, I suppose it's possible that the mismatch
it introduced was detuning the amplifier so badly that only a fraction
of the normal output was getting to the antenna(s). That would only
happen, of course, if the amplifier had been tuned up with a different
feed configuration. And it would have made the amplifier very warm, too.
I suppose another possiblilty is that the mismatch screwed up the phase in
one of the antennas so badly that everything was radiating in the wrong
direction. In any case, it's quite unlikely that hundreds of watts
of RF were just dissipated somewhere, because that much power really
burns things up fast.
Scott K9MA
>From sellington at mail.ssec.wisc.edu Wed Dec 2 11:18:32 1992
From: sellington at mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: Multiplier question
Message-ID: <mailman.11.1043801127.8266.cq-contest at contesting.com>
Is the penalty for a claiming multiplier which is then deleted by
the judges greater than just the loss of the multiplier, assuming
you made a valid contact?
Scott K9MA
>From WLMyers at fandago.Read.TASC.COM Wed Dec 2 12:54:34 1992
From: WLMyers at fandago.Read.TASC.COM (Bill Myers)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: CQWW CW - K1AR at K1EA
Message-ID: <9212021754.AA04894 at snowwhite.read.tasc.com>
Additional poop:
Each band had one radio. We didn't even have headphone splitters. No
serious problems, although Kenwood transceivers start to fall apart when
the line voltage is 106 volts.
Operators by band 160 to 10 were K1MEM K1MM K1AR W1RM K1EA K1GQ; KM3T
helped out for about 2 hours. We all spent some time on other bands. 5
world-class ops and one has-been (me).
K1EA has two towers. Among other things, that means 20/15 and 40/10 share
rotators. If there's any interest I'll post a complete antenna
description, but this is **not** a classical M/M setup.
My belief is that being at the center of both the CT and the PacketCluster
universes, combined with great ops, is equivalent to a whole lot of outdoor
hardware.
K1GQ
Bill Myers WLMyers at tasc.com
Department Staff Analyst
TASC
55 Walkers Brook Drive
Reading MA 01867
TEL: (617) 942 2000 x2116
FAX: (617) 942 7100
>From alan at dsd.es.com Wed Dec 2 11:16:49 1992
From: alan at dsd.es.com (Alan Brubaker)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: Multiplier question
In-Reply-To: Your message of "02 Dec 92 11:18:32 +0800."
<9212021740.AA00799 at orca.es.com>
Message-ID: <9212021816.AA24278 at dsd.ES.COM>
RE: penalty for deleted multiplier(s).
As far as I remember, there is no penalty. If I remember correctly, you
may be disqualified for leaving an excessive number of duplicate QSOs in
the log. I do not know what the definition of excessive is, however. Does
anyone have the official rules handy? I do not.
Alan
>From Doug.Grant at analog.com Wed Dec 2 14:14:00 1992
From: Doug.Grant at analog.com (Doug.Grant at analog.com)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: cqww scores
Message-ID: <m0mwzWS-0000MyC at ibm_gate.analog.com>
CQWW CW Scores .. from 3830, Packet, and "CQ-Contest"
Single-op
KM1H 6.03M 3256-163-479 KQ2M, opr
N4RJ 6.02M 3050-172-509 KM9P, opr
N2NT 5.8M 3198-153-471 at NF2L
KN8Z 5.583M 2988-172-469 WA8YVR, opr
VE3EJ 5.1M
K3ZO 5.0M 3025-157-421
N2LT 4.9M 2774-157-446
N6BV/1 4.23M 2720-140-396
W1PH 4.15M 2147-136-509
K1ZZ 4.07M 2308-153-467
NA8V 4.0M 2366-163-433
K5GN 3.8M 2161-168-449
N6UR 3.7M 2518-156-366 KR6X opr
W9RE 3.6M
W1WEF 3.2M 2009-145-411
K4PQL 3.0M 1928-141-400
W6QHS 2.43M 1701-163-330
K4XU 2.41M
NN7L 2.38M 1905-144-300
AK3Z 2.37M 1587-142-385 K2PH opr
N8II 2.04M low power
W9UP 2.0M
K9MA 1.9M 1393-139-342
K0KX 1.7M 1196-147-364
N1CC 1.2M 1001-113-302
K7SV 1.2M low power
N4YDU 1.1M
K1YRP 1.0M 902-109-282 low power
K6XO/7 262K
P40W 9.7M 5700-150-423 W2GD, opr
QRP
AA2U 1.2M 940-118-330
Single-op Assisted
K8AZ 5.042M 2477-172-537
K3WW 4.876M
KC1XX 4.6M 2152-166-572
WR3E 4.16M 1923-171-585
K2SX 3.9M
KC1F 3.7M 1921-157-511
AA2DU 3.3M 1757-149-509
K1VR 3.23 1658-153-479
K2WK 2.97M
K5NW 2.2M 1475-155-393
W1RR 1.9M
K3ND 1.49M 909-145-429
KF2O 1.436M
WE1F 1.3M
NV3V 163K
Single-Band
K2EK 160 160-19-62
K1ZM 80 1088-30-106
K1IU 80 946-28-91
W1MK 80 964-25-80
KT3Y 80 694-25-86
K0RF 80 140K 523-30-76
KO0U 80 117K
N5RZ 80 92K 347-25-72
KO7V 80 73K
WA4SVO 80 255-17-55
PJ9U 40 1.196M 2749-30-116
ZF2TG 40 1.162M 3213-31-111
W7XR 40 800K 1642-38-138
K4XS 40 688K 1437-36-128
KB0G 40 638K 1310-34-140
N6RO 40 385K 925-35-115
K2VV 20 930K 1720-40-148
KW8N 20 1548-39-140
N2BA 20 1537-39-134
N9AW 20 255K
W0UN 15 645K 1457-35-122 W0UA, opr
K3EST/6 15 500K 1139-36-120 at N6RO
KC1SJ 15 456K 964-35-129
WA7RJY 15 302-32-69
J33A 15 950K 2446-36-119
KA5W 10 1078-34-113
KT4W 10 400K 969-34-117
K1GX 10 393K 895-33-129
P40X 10 1.2M 2838-33-111 N6BT, opr
Multi-single
N3RS 8.7M 3499-186-674
K1KI 8.3M 3372-182-663
K1DG 8.3M 3355-182-645
WW2Y 6.1M 2786-175-595
W1OO 5.4M 2535-167-572
W6GO 5.2M 2739-180-540
K2SG 4.5M 2445-153-489
KN2M 4.3M 2220-162-511
AA1K 4.3M 2109-160-555
WD8LLD 3.97M 2002-170-538
NK7U 3.1M 2032-153-392
W0CP 3.1M 1869-162-433
W9KDX 2.5M 1540-150-423
KS9B 2M 1579-136-336
KH2S 7.975M 4515-170-426
S79S 5+M 3420-136-389
VP5T 3.5M
Multi-multi
K1AR 20.0M 7290 / 193 / 758
N2RM 19.0M 6978 / 196 / 738
W3LPL 17.4M 6482 / 196 / 738
NL7G 15.0M 9426 / 175 / 461
AD1C 13.0M 5394 / 177 / 624
AA6TT 9.71M
VE2CSI 8.7M 6944-127-403
NQ4I 6.6M
KY3N 6.87M 3109-170-604
CQWW CW Breakdowns
Multi-Single
K1KI K1DG N3RS KN2M
51 / 13 / 35 40 / 14 / 37 44 / 15 / 41 19 / 10 / 14
304 / 26 / 92 256 / 23 / 83 141 / 26 / 82 70 / 18 / 51
1054 / 36 / 134 1095 / 37 / 131 1038 / 36 / 137 604 / 32 / 111
587 / 38 / 144 627 / 39 / 136 852 / 39 / 145 537 / 37 / 114
614 / 36 / 133 801 / 36 / 136 688 / 37 / 137 569 / 35 / 112
762 / 33 / 125 536 / 33 / 122 736 / 33 / 132 421 / 30 / 109
---------------- ----------------- ------------------ -----------------
3372 / 182 / 663 8.3M 3355 / 182 / 645 8.03M 3499 / 186 / 674 8.7M 2220 /
162 / 511 4.3M
KH2S
32 8 8
118 22 45
1304 33 88
558 35 98
1335 37 102
1168 35 85
--------------------------
4515 170 426
Multi-Multi
NL7G K1AR N2RM W3LPL AD1C
186 12 14 109 16 59 102 18 54 89 18 50 50 12 31
537 16 22 742 29 108 692 30 99 602 28 96 512 21 83
1727 36 105 1917 37 142 1553 37 143 1622 38 144 1301 35 119
2894 39 125 1770 39 157 1738 39 153 1718 39 157 1511 39 148
2461 37 118 1615 37 154 1691 37 150 1440 37 152 1322 36 139
1621 35 77 1137 35 138 1202 35 139 1011 36 139 898 34 121
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
9426 175 461 7290 193 758 6978 196 738 6482 196 738 5394 177 624
Single-op
N2LT KM1H N4RJ N2NT
160 25 9 16 37 11 26 34 13 27 38 14 25
80 187 19 55 363 23 64 170 21 66 301 17 65
40 761 32 102 783 31 93 727 34 104 957 29 94
20 410 35 89 515 33 91 708 37 114 591 35 103
15 744 31 99 646 33 106 729 35 106 613 30 94
10 647 31 85 912 32 99 682 32 92 698 28 90
---------------------------- --------------- -------------- -------------
2774 157 446 3256 163 479 3050 172 509 3198 153 471
>From Doug.Grant at analog.com Wed Dec 2 16:03:00 1992
From: Doug.Grant at analog.com (Doug.Grant at analog.com)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: Sorry about the mess
Message-ID: <m0mx11v-0000NVC at ibm_gate.analog.com>
Sorry the file I uploaded came out so messy in the breakdowns. If anyone
REALLYREALLY can't decipher htem, I'll fix 'em.
dg
>From penneys at freezer.cns.udel.edu Wed Dec 2 19:14:51 1992
From: penneys at freezer.cns.udel.edu (robert penneys)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: K1EA DVP w/XT?
Message-ID: <9212030014.AA11478 at freezer.cns.udel.edu>
Will the K1EA DVP work with an XT clone with 640K ram and a 20meg drive?
Tnx Bob WN3K FRC
>From 0004504465 at mcimail.com Thu Dec 3 02:11:00 1992
From: 0004504465 at mcimail.com (Eugene Walsh)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: subscribe
Message-ID: <12921203021121/0004504465PK1EM at mcimail.com>
TREY; N2AA WANTS TO GET ON THE LIST. I AM ewalsh at mci.com or
450-4465 at mci.com
AT LEAST I THINK THAT IS HOW IT WORKS. HOPE YOU DID WELL, TKS
FOR ALL OF THE QSOs, I WAS ON 20 AT N2RM. 73 DE GENE
>From n6tv at vnet.ibm.com Wed Dec 2 18:19:48 1992
From: n6tv at vnet.ibm.com (Robert A. Wilson)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: K1EA DVP w/XT?
Message-ID: <mailman.12.1043801127.8266.cq-contest at contesting.com>
No, the DVP will not work with an XT-class machine. An XT just doesn't
have enough CPU power.
73,
Bob, N6TV
>From 0004504465 at mcimail.com Thu Dec 3 02:23:00 1992
From: 0004504465 at mcimail.com (Eugene Walsh)
Date: Tue Jan 28 19:45:27 2003
Subject: subscribe
Message-ID: <00921203022300/0004504465PK1EM at mcimail.com>
trey; sorry my mail address suffix is @mcimail.com
73 de gene n2aa
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list