SS CW Score de KF3P
TYLERSTEWART at delphi.com
TYLERSTEWART at delphi.com
Fri Nov 12 02:15:34 EST 1993
SS CW Single Op High Power Score from MDC
1265 Q's - 75 Sections = 189,750 points
80 was HOT on east coast...high bands NOT!
CU on Phone!
Tyler, KF3P
/ex
>From k2mm at MasPar.COM (John Zapisek) Fri Nov 12 07:36:52 1993
From: k2mm at MasPar.COM (John Zapisek) (John Zapisek)
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 23:36:52 PST
Subject: Two-Edged SprINT Busts
Message-ID: <9311120736.AA10309 at greylock.local>
Charlie, Alan, and all you other Internet SprINTers: This note explains
some of the rationale behind "two-edged scoring". It also asks that you
include in your log's comments any notes about mis-sent names or numbers.
> [K2MM] The name Alan survived OK for six QSOs. It was correctly received
> by KD5PJ on the sixth hop. On the seventh hop, KD5PJ worked K6XO who
> recorded Max in his log. . . .
> [Charlie/KD5PJ] I need to come clean here. I fouled this up. . . .
> I panicked. I sent Max to K6XO.
If you know you sent the wrong name, please say so in your log's comments.
The log-checking software assumes you sent the name previously received,
but it can handle the odd exception. So far, we have allowed credit for
QSOs with the wrong sent-name or sent-number -- provided they are clearly
indicated and not excessive. Remember that this averts wrongfully busting
not just your QSO, but the other op's as well.
> [Alan/K6XO] . . . this points up the scenario where if either station
> makes an error, the scores of both stations suffer. Not a fair way to
> assess operator performance and accuracy, in my opinion.
Note to Alan: The two-edged bust rule works in your favor in this case.
Charlie's log says he sent you Alan. Your log says you received Max. With
classical scoring, *your* QSO would be busted for mis-copying Alan, but
Charlie would suffer no penalty. It assumes (wrongly) that sending and
logging errors do not occur, just receiveing errors. With two-edged
scoring, Charlie also pays the price for mis-logging the sent name. This
gives him more incentive to correctly log the QSO, thereby reducing the odds
of your suffering a wrongful bust.
I think this makes sense. 73. --John/K2MM
>From Takao Kumagai <je1cka at asuka.aerospace-lab.go.jp> Fri Nov 12 16:04:55 1993
From: Takao Kumagai <je1cka at asuka.aerospace-lab.go.jp> (Takao Kumagai)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 93 16:04:55 JST
Subject: Should any ops call not be appeard on any other logs?
Message-ID: <9311120704.AA14589 at asuka.aerospace-lab.go.jp>
re:PJ1B's M/S operation
I've never imagine those kind of operation technique so far.
These operations are legal in most countries and ok in PJ land.
Does CQ WW rule prohibit this clearly? No I don't think so.
So this N3ED/PJ4 operation with PJ1B might not be considered as
M/M? But this operation is in the gray zones between M/S & M/M.
Did any other M/S station do this? Is this never tried?
Will you fellow contesters accept this from the view of M/S ethic?
I say "NO".
I strongly recommend to add one comment in CQ WW rule that;
*Any operators' callsign would not be appeared on anyone's log.
I heard that M/S or M/M operators did work the M/S or M/M stations
for their multiplier. for example at KH0AM m/m, AH0K is one of the
ops and he can work KH0AM using KH0AM's equipments for KH0AM's multi
with his AH0K callsign.
It is impossible to get the own country mult while you are the
only one station in that country but I've never did this at KH0AM.
If this has been widely accepted ever, PJ1B technique will be accepted.
I feel there is no difference between two cases(PJ1B and KH0AM)
This might be discussed at the CQ WW Contest Committee.
(I believe most contest committee members are e-mail accessible
and reading this reflecter. So now the time Bob?)
I saw the comment in some (yes some not one) M/M stations operating
guide that;
If you got a call from the stations which be other bands multi, you
should requst hir to move the bands for mult.
But do this only when you are called. (or something like that)
Tack KUMAGAI
JE1CKA/KH0AM
One of the crazy contesters in the risingsun country.
>From Jim Reisert AD1C 12-Nov-1993 1021 <reisert at wrksys.enet.dec.com> Fri Nov 12 15:16:34 1993
From: Jim Reisert AD1C 12-Nov-1993 1021 <reisert at wrksys.enet.dec.com> (Jim Reisert AD1C 12-Nov-1993 1021)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 93 10:16:34 EST
Subject: new MERGE for CT Version 8
Message-ID: <9311121516.AA27444 at us1rmc.bb.dec.com>
[The original bounced, hope this copy makes it OK]
Ken just put a new MERGE.ZIP on the CT BBS (508-460-8877). This has both
MERGE.EXE and MERGE386.EXE. The new MERGE is compatible with CT version 8.
Previous versions of MERGE (even those that were distributed on the version
8 disks) would only really work with .BIN files created with CT version 7.
As a reminder, MERGE.EXE can run on any computer 8086-80486, while MERGE386
can run on only 80386 and above machines. It does not matter which kind of
computer created the .BIN file, the .BIN file format is the same whether
you're using CT86.EXE, CT286.EXE or CT386.EXE.
73 - Jim AD1C
>From george fremin iii <geoiii at wixer.bga.com> Fri Nov 12 15:51:42 1993
From: george fremin iii <geoiii at wixer.bga.com> (george fremin iii)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 93 9:51:42 CST
Subject: cw ss scores
Message-ID: <9311121551.AA11092 at wixer>
11-12 1548z
single op high power
WM5G 1604 76
W5WMU 1557 77
N4RJ 1529 77
K5GN 1462 77
W7RM 1444 77
K6LL 1428 77
N2IC 1422 77
K0RF 1414 77
NC0P 1409 77
K9FD 1400 77
NM5M 1383 77
K5MR 1377 76
K3LR 1372 76
VE3EJ 1364 76
K7UP 1357 76
AH3C 1351 77
N6TV 1313 77
KZ2S 1300 76
W6EEN 1298 77
K1TO 1292 76
N8RR 1281 77
W1XE 1271 77
KF3P 1265 75
K1DG 1257 76
K4VX 1253 77
N6RO 1248 77
W6QHS 1248 77
AA7NX 1238 77
KQ8M 1238 76
KI3L 1237 77
AA4NC 1230 76
W5KFT 1227 76
KT3Y 1220 75
WA8ZDT 1218 76
K3ZO 1215 76
K6KM 1199 77
W2SC 1190 76
KW8N 1187 76
AA6KX 1094 77
KE9I 1053 77
W2RQ 1050 75
K2MM 1038 77
WB1GQR 1016 74
W5ASP 1000 76
WG9L 903 77
WE9V 874 76
KF8QE 894 76
W9YH 848 76
AA8U 831 75
W1IHN 715 76
N6AZE 281 73
N4TQO 213 57
K5EC 63 33
single op low power
NP4A 1388 77
N5RZ 1315 76
KY7M 1217 75
AD5Q 1210 77
K0EU 1173 75
W1FEA 1106 77
AB6FO 1075 76
K4XU 1070 76
N4AA 1030 77
N0AT 1016 76
N4TY 1006 74
WA2SRQ 950 76
W6UQF 939 77
AC5K 923 76
VE4VV 916 77
KZ4H 913 76
KQ7I 912 76
NJ2L 901 76
KO9Y 852 77
KP4TQ 840 73
N6MZ 823 77
N9JF 804 75
AI6E 782 74
N7LOX 718 76
NN5T 712 75
N6PN 685 76
AA6MC 682 76
KE4GY 682 74
N0AX 615 76
WN3K 567 76
W5XD 565 72
WA1U 529 76
WT0K 471 70
KF9PL 455 73
ND1H 429 70
K7GM 425 72
KI4HN 347 69
N6KL 340 70
AC9CH 310 72
NG0X 260 31
KJ5JC 194 55
KU4A 152 61
AA5UO 149 52
NV3V 111 47
single op qrp
K0FRP 824 75
W2GD 814 76
W9UP 788 76
AA2U 757 75
W9RE 751 76
K1TR 686 76
WA4PGM 667 76
W7YAQ 590 73
KB4GID 569 72
N5NMX 465 73
WB2CPU 353 69
VE5VA 193 65
WA7BNM 100 52
N0BSH 16 14
multi-op
AA5B 1501 77
W4AQL 1379 77
N6VR 1321 77
WX0B 1308 76
K5OJI 1284 77
K6XT 1220 77
KB0S 1161 77
K0PP 1095 77
W6BIP 1048 77
KI6X 1004 76
NV6O 666 77
K6XO 549 75
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list