Extra Dayton Room ?
jsteinman at aol.com
jsteinman at aol.com
Mon Feb 7 20:11:22 EST 1994
Hola
Does anyone have an extra room [Stouffers or other downtown
QTH] they don't need ? Ralph, N5RZ, decided it was time to hit
Dayton after a decade long absense, but he has no room. Please respond
DIRECTLY to me at: jsteinman at aol.com
73s
Jeff Steinman KR0Y
>From Brian Bogh <0006125879 at mcimail.com> Mon Feb 7 19:48:00 1994
From: Brian Bogh <0006125879 at mcimail.com> (Brian Bogh)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 94 14:48 EST
Subject: sprint score
Message-ID: <03940207194830/0006125879NA5EM at mcimail.com>
N7LOX cw sprint/ 100 watts with no class
band qso
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
80 40
40 76
20 78
TOTAL 194 194 /34=6596
Club or Team Name: Lunatic Fringe
First time using computer logging and keying
in this contest, please stop the world from
spining. No actually it wasn't to bad. Now all
I need is an amp and some low band antennas..
cu in the phone sprint.
Brian / N7LOX mci id: 612-5879
>From DKMC" <dkmc at chevron.com Tue Feb 8 01:15:04 1994
From: DKMC" <dkmc at chevron.com (DKMC)
Date: 07 Feb 94 17:15:04 PST
Subject: NCJ NA Sprint CW K5GN
Message-ID: <CPLAN065.DKMC.4738.1994 02070813 0813>
Microsoft Mail v3.0 IPM.Microsoft Mail.Note
From: McCarty, DK 'David'
To: OPEN ADDRESSING SERVI-OPENADDR
Subject: NCJ NA Sprint CW K5GN
Date: 1994-02-07 10:03
Priority:
Fixed Font: 0001
Message ID: 5BDDB957
Conversation ID: 5BDDB957
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NCJ North American Sprint
CONTEST SUMMARY SHEET
1. DATE OF CONTEST:
Date of contest (UTC).........................6 February 1994
2. STATION:
Callsign used.................................K5GN
State or Country..............................TEXAS
(actual station used:..........K2UA/5)
3. OPERATOR:
Callsign......................................K5GN
Name..........................................David K. McCarty
Address.......................................8603 Manhattan Drive
..............................................Houston, TX 77096
4. SCORE:
HOUR 80CW 40CW 20CW TOTAL ACCUM
---- ------ ------ ------ ----- -----
0 0 3 91 94 94
1 0 48 30 78 172
2 12 70 1 83 255
3 79 6 0 85 340
TOTAL 91 127 122 340
MULTIPLIERS: 45
FINAL SCORE: 15300
TEAM..(pre-registered)........................Texas DX Society
Equipment: 80: FT-1000D/BTI LK-2000 (1500W), 4 el quad NE 90', Dipole 130'
40: S-Line/Alpha 78 (1500W), 4 el KLM NW 180', 2 el quad NE 80'
20: TS930S/Alpha 76 (1400W), 4/4 (204BA) NW 135' / NE 80'
Software: N6TR 4.05
Questions:
...Where was XE1/AA6RX?
...Why do FOCers work only FOCers?
...Why was NL7GP in Az instead of Ak?
...Will K5GN ever get to Page 8?
...(and, as always, how does Jeff do it?)
David K. McCarty, K5GN
dkmc at chevron.com
>From DKMC" <dkmc at chevron.com Tue Feb 8 01:15:04 1994
From: DKMC" <dkmc at chevron.com (DKMC)
Date: 07 Feb 94 17:15:04 PST
Subject: Sprint: K5GA vs K5GN
Message-ID: <CPLAN065.DKMC.4740.1994 02070813 0813>
Microsoft Mail v3.0 IPM.Microsoft Mail.Note
From: McCarty, DK 'David'
To: OPEN ADDRESSING SERVI-OPENADDR
Subject: Sprint: K5GA vs K5GN
Date: 1994-02-07 10:05
Priority:
Fixed Font: 0001
Message ID: 707E30D1
Conversation ID: 707E30D1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Bill went to W5WMU for the CW Sprint. I went to K2UA/5. We were really
neck and neck right to the tape. Thought the gang might like to see some
details of this close one:
During the contest:
00:59z K5GN 94/W5WMU 89 (I'm thinking big things, here.)
02:09z K5GN 187/W5WMU 188 (Uh, oh, where did I go wrong?)
02:53z K5GN 246/W5WMU 248 (Yikes, he'll eat me up on 80])
Analysis on 75M:
10 MIN. NR OF LAST QSOs MADE LEAD
TIME QSO IN SEGMT. K5GN'S IN SEGMT SWING
SEGMENT K5GA K5GN LEAD K5GA K5GN IN SEG. COMMENTS:
0000-0009 19 20 1 19 20 1 Good start, both.
0010-0019 35 35 0 16 15 -1
0020-0029 48 53 5 13 18 5 GA slows (cuz
0030-0039 62 68 6 14 15 1 farther east?)
0040-0049 75 84 9 13 16 3 GA 2nd rig on 40
0050-0059 90 94 4 15 10 -5 GN 2nd rig on 40
0100-0109 103 106 3 13 12 -1 GA goes to 40
0110-0119 118 122 4 15 16 1 GN goes to 40
0120-0129 136 139 3 18 17 -1 GA ends 20
0130-0139 150 152 2 14 13 -1
0140-0149 165 162 -3 15 10 -5 GN loses sync
0150-0159 177 172 -5 12 10 -2 GN ends 20
0200-0209 190 188 -2 13 16 3
0210-0219 203 204 1 13 16 3
0220-0229 215 213 -2 12 9 -3 GN loses grip agn]
0230-0239 227 227 0 12 14 2 GN 2nd rig on 80
0240-0249 245 241 -4 18 14 -4 GA goes to 80
0250-0259 258 256 -2 13 15 2
0300-0309 272 271 -1 14 15 1 GN goes to 80
0310-0319 284 288 4 12 17 5 GN ends 40
0320-0329 298 303 5 14 15 1
0330-0339 310 315 5 12 12 0
0340-0349 325 329 4 15 14 -1
0350-0359 331 341 10 6 12 6 GA "loses it"
Dupes: 0 1
Turns out Billy did not have the multipliers to overcome the difference at
the end.
K5GA: 331x41=13571 #7?
K5GN: 340x45=15300 #2?
73,
Dave
David K. McCarty, K5GN
dkmc at chevron.com
>From ken.silverman at atlas.ccmail.PacTel.COM (ken silverman) Tue Feb 8 01:31:18 1994
From: ken.silverman at atlas.ccmail.PacTel.COM (ken silverman) (ken silverman)
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 94 17:31:18 PST
Subject: Contest QSLing
Message-ID: <9401077606.AA760671078 at atlas.ccmail.pactel.com>
All this talk is interesting, this comes from a person who
hates QSLing. I do not collect QSLs, but I do know that I
go around the world to be DX, and that comes with a price.
That price is that I will send QSLs to all that send one to
me, postage or not.
One way I try to get around the duties of contest QSLing is
that I tend to operate contests from an existing station,
that has existing QSL routes. I gladly make up QSLs for the
operation. In fact, I am in the process of making nice
color QSLs for the 4M5I operation in the CQ WW CW.
Having the ARRL use logs sounds great on the surface, again
from one who hates to QSL. BUT. But I think I can say for
lots of people, that having QSLs up on the wall is kinda
nice. One often makes lots of rare DX QSO's during a
contest, and if I collected QSLs, I would want that QSL on
the wall. No way that would happen now.
Having the ARRL serve as the QSl manager may be the death to
your verification at all. I get a few cards that for some
reason, I copied wrong (we all make SOME mistakes). I
always give the person looking for a QSL the benefit of the
doubt. If I have WM2K in the log, but the guy sends me a
card for WM2N, I send the card. Should the ARRL have to
make those judgements? I suspect they would be forced to
use the electronic log as fact. No benifits of the doubt.
How many of these people who QSl can't seem to tell time?
Plus or minus a few minutes is acceptable, but sometimes
thier off by hours, days, or some unkown time that has no
relation to anything. Again, should the ARRL have to make
the decision on which one of these people gets the
confirmation or not? I put QSLs who are "NIL" on the
bottwom of the pile, but always get to them some day. It
often takes a lot of time to figure out what's up. If the
ARRL has to do this, forget your QSL.
Having a person, or QSl manager do you logs has a lot of
advantages over eletronic processing at the ARRL - you get
the personal touch of QSLing. I persoally would love to see
the ARRL handle my QSL verification, but for those who fit
in any of the above catagories, I suspect you will be out of
luck in getting the benefit of the doubt.
Ken WM2C
>From robert penneys <penneys at freezer.cns.udel.edu> Tue Feb 8 01:30:51 1994
From: robert penneys <penneys at freezer.cns.udel.edu> (robert penneys)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 94 20:30:51 EST
Subject: NERDS CW Sprint results
Message-ID: <9402080130.AA21524 at freezer.cns.udel.edu>
Lotta no shows. 3 logs.
KE3Q 242x38 9196
WA4PGM 226x39 8814
WN3K 173x34 5882
Total 23,892
Hope to have ten on Sat and still need a couple. How 'bout it?
Bob WN3K
>From DKMC" <dkmc at chevron.com Tue Feb 8 02:00:23 1994
From: DKMC" <dkmc at chevron.com (DKMC)
Date: 07 Feb 94 18:00:23 PST
Subject: Requiring Electronic Logs
Message-ID: <CPLAN065.DKMC.4966.1994 02070912 0912>
Microsoft Mail v3.0 IPM.Microsoft Mail.Note
From: McCarty, DK 'David'
To: OPEN ADDRESSING SERVI-OPENADDR
Subject: Requiring Electronic Logs
Date: 1994-02-07 11:02
Priority:
Fixed Font: 0001
Message ID: F25D8F8E
Conversation ID: F25D8F8E
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary goal is to get as many *logs* submitted as possible.
Getting the electronic ones is a secondary goal, related to
improving checking of the results.
Question for CQ and ARRL:
fztrqHow many logs (fraction of total) does the sponsoring
fztrqorganization receive which are printed by a computer,
fztrqbut no disk accompanies the entry? How many logs
fztrq(again, fraction of total) come on disk?
I think the way to get more in electronically is to make
electronic entries one of the following:
fztrqCheaper (diskettes are lighter, if paper not required)
fztrqEasier (paper can be a pain/internet is fast)
fztrqMore valuable.
More valuable might mean sending an sase with my diskette for a
return of my diskette with feedback and statistics on it (e.g.,
which contacts were found to be bad and why). If the answer to
the question above is significant, perhaps software could be
developed by the sponsor to provide this benefit as an incentive.
David K. McCarty, K5GN
dkmc at chevron.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list