CW NAQP RESULTS rev 1/11/94
ka9fox at aol.com
ka9fox at aol.com
Tue Jan 11 13:14:03 EST 1994
JANUARY 1994
NORTH AMERICAN QSO PARTY
CW RESULTS as of 1/11/94
(send updates to KA9FOX at AOL.COM)
(anybody have N6TR score?)
CALL QSO MULT TOTAL
------------------------
N5RZ 807 248 200,136
K6LL 745 243 181,035
KM9P 737 220 162,140
K5NW 710 228 161,880
N6TV 708 218 154,344
N0AX 654 211 137,994
W9NQ 669 205 137,145
W9UP 634 212 134,408 (KA9FOX op)
AB6FO 625 208 130,000
WD0T 627 205 128,535
AD5Q 661 190 125,590
VE4VV 633 195 123,435
N4OGW 578 205 118,490
AA7NX 598 191 114,218
N4TQO 552 195 107,640
WA2SRQ 534 184 98,256
AB4RX 503 190 95,570
N7LOX 524 179 93,796
KJ4VH 479 193 92,447
N9JF 432 175 75,600
N6TW 392 161 63,112
AA9AX 381 164 62,484
WQ5L 430 143 61,490
ND1H 396 149 59,004
N8NA 369 153 56,457
WN3K 341 165 56,265
AA6MC 364 152 55,328
WV9T 358 146 52,268
WZ1R 324 132 42,768
K7SS 281 144 40,464
W1IHN 300 129 38,700
KS0T 275 131 36,025
NF6H 254 136 34,544
KE4GY 300 110 33,000
NV6O 243 125 30,375
N5NMX 264 104 27,456
WB5M 266 97 25,802
K2MM 209 106 22,154
KI4HN 207 99 20,493
KU4A 193 106 20,458
K5OJI 220 80 17,280 (KD5PJ op)
>From Jim Stevens" <ki4hn at vnet.IBM.COM Tue Jan 11 18:50:23 1994
From: Jim Stevens" <ki4hn at vnet.IBM.COM (Jim Stevens)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 94 13:50:23 EST
Subject: NA QP SSB Internet Teams?
I've only received e-mail from one person thus far. Has everyone already got
a team? If not and your interested on being on an Internet team, send me
e-mail.
73, Jim, KI4HN
>From clay rudolf <rtclay at uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Tue Jan 11 19:06:26 1994
From: clay rudolf <rtclay at uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> (clay rudolf)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 1994 13:06:26 -0600 (CST)
Subject: N4OGW NAQP CW
Message-ID: <Pine.3.05.9401111326.A27397-a100000 at uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
160CW 123 38
80CW 189 46
40CW 105 44
20CW 75 36
15CW 46 20
10CW 38 21
total: 576 X 205 = 118,080
Station: Icom 735 + Drake C-line
80m dipole, 80m delta loop, 160 inverted L
Time: 10 hrs.
Operated field-day style from a farm in KY...started putting up antennas
at 9am that morning, barely managed to be on the air at 1 pm. Spent too
much time on the low bands, but seemed to get out best on 160/80/40. It
seemed that there were fewer multipliers floating around this time...had
21 more last year. Sorry about some of the qsy's I missed...frequency
selection isn't terribly precise with the Drake.
R. Torsten Clay, N4OGW n4ogw at uiuc.edu
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list