Networking WF1B RTTY software?

[Leonard J Popyack, Jr.]

On Wed, 14 Sep 1994 16:36:07 -0700 (PD, M Glenn Vinson Jr wrote:

>I just talked to Ray, WF1B, who says that networking is not supported with
>the RTTY software at this time.  He says the programming job would be very
[deleted stuff]
>Glenn, W6OTC (mgvinson at crl.com)
Glenn, where can I get a copy of the basic WF1B RTTY software?  What 
equip does it need?  What contests does it currently support?  Thx
Len WF2V

>From Peter G. Smith" <n4zr at netcom.com  Thu Sep 15 11:40:21 1994
From: Peter G. Smith" <n4zr at netcom.com (Peter G. Smith)
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 1994 03:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Questions on 80M Loop
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9409150345.A18938-0100000 at netcom10>


On 14 Sep 1994, Kurszewski Chad wrote:

> Roger Hoeft aka KA9EKJ wrote:
> 
> > I recently installed an 80 meter loop such that the loop is up about 50 feet 
> > and roughly horizontal.  In the brief time I have worked with the loop, I 
> > have noticed that reception on my roof-mounted HF6V is consistently about 2 
> > S units stronger (albeit noisier) than the loop.
> 
> What you have constructed is known as a "Cloud Warmer".  This antenna will only
> be louder than the vertical if you are working the next COUNTY, not next
> COUNTRY. 

STUFF deleted

> 
> The only way the loop will outperform the vertical is if you make the loop's
> plane perpendicular the the ground...this will direct the RF at the horizon,
> perpendicular to the loop.
> 

Well ... quoth N4ZR ... not necessarily.  My 80-m full-wave square loop 
is fed at the lower corner (as someone "authoritative" suggested in 
print).  It's in the vertical plane, but both computer modeling and on 
the air results indicate that it's a cloud-warmer too.  Max radiation is 
about 60 degrees above the horizon.  The best theoretical place to feed 
one of these for low angle of radiation - at least one like mine, where the 
lower wire is very close to the ground - is half-way or more up one side.


Pete N4ZR at netcom.com