PAT WA7NIN FONE #
Ai7b at teleport.com
Ai7b at teleport.com
Thu Aug 10 07:59:16 EDT 1995
I need to get ahold of Pat....anyone have his fone number????
>From Larry Tyree <tree at cmicro.com> Thu Aug 10 15:07:13 1995
From: Larry Tyree <tree at cmicro.com> (Larry Tyree)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 07:07:13 -0700
Subject: QSYing
Message-ID: <199508101407.HAA18186 at cascade.cmicro.com>
There are several techniques used to QSY to another band. Some people
assume you are going to stay on your same frequency but on the new
band (ie: 14045 -> 21045 -> 28045). Others will pick a frequency
likely to be clear (ie: up the band around 050 or 060).
In the old days before the rigs had a memory of the frequency you were
last on, the first method was perferred. Now with computer frequency
control, the quickest way to QSY is to type in the new frequency.
This gets more complicated if the band you are going to is serviced by
a second radio. And if that radio is a C line without digital display,
and maybe the crystal for that band is off a little from the others...
One tool we could use from the old CW traffic nets is the G signal that
indicates we are going to be turning our bandswitch in the next second.
It is a short version of GG, meaning you are going to QSY.
So, it gets down to a personal choice which frequency to use.
I personally like to use something above the normal activity. Maybe
060 is a good choice. If we used a standard frequency for this type of
thing (or range of frequencies), maybe some people will just listen there.
It is always fun to follow two stations and work both of them.
Tree N6TR
>From Daniel R. Violette" <Daniel_R._Violette at ccmail.anatcp.rockwell.com Thu Aug 10 17:26:04 1995
From: Daniel R. Violette" <Daniel_R._Violette at ccmail.anatcp.rockwell.com (Daniel R. Violette)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 08:26:04 PST
Subject: QTH
Message-ID: <9507108080.AA808068603 at ccmail.anatcp.rockwell.com>
[Can't resist...]
You sure you want a town already up. Without a town you'll have less
neighbors to interfere with... ;)
73,
Dan KI6X
e-mail: Daniel_R._Violette at ccmail.anatcp.rockwell.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: QTH
Author: wosborne at nmsu.edu at SMTPGTY
Date: 8/10/95 7:07 AM
I will be movig to Dallas next month and I was wondering if anyone knew of a
house or land for sale in the Frisco/Prosper area without tower restrictions or
with a town already up? Thanks
William Osborne, AA5ZQ
wosborne at nmsu.edu
505-646-3919
>From De Syam <syam at Glue.umd.edu> Thu Aug 10 17:09:07 1995
From: De Syam <syam at Glue.umd.edu> (De Syam)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 12:09:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: YO DX Contest; K3ZO results and comments
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950810114633.5067A-100000 at latte.eng.umd.edu>
What with all the reports of NAQP activity, one would have thought that
there were no W's left to compete in the YO DX Contest. Not so! I did
and I also heard KA1DWX, my frequent partner in second tier DX contests,
knocking them off as well.
Here's my breakdown:
(SOAB CW only):
Band QSO YO provinces ITU Zones
80 12 4 2
40 65 21 9
20 129 22 13
15 1 0 1
TOTALS 207 47 + 25 (x 1156 pts) =
83232 points, final score
Comments: Since we East Coasters have been accused of doing nothing but
"hitting F1 all weekend long" in the big contests, let it be said that I
use these second tier DX contests to hone my S&P techniques. In the
first place, I prefer to work people who are really in the contest I am
in and not just doing me a favor by offering to give me a point.
Secondly, some contest sponsors only give you credit for a QSO if the
other station's log was received.
In one instance on 40, however, someone called me after I finished with a
station I called so I worked him, and then a couple of others called, so
sensing I was in demand, I moved up a bit and ran a few until the well
went dry. Guess there were others S&P'ing besides me! Which brings to
mind a truism: "If everyone S&P's and nobody calls CQ, the bands are
awfully quiet!" A couple of times on 20 when I absolutely couldn't find
anyone new, I called CQ and ran off a few.
Comments on conditions:
80: QRN but I got every European I could hear.
40: Excellent conditions, but Radio Vatican still puts out their hash.
20: Conditions were pretty good, band open pretty late.
15: Only one European worked here; I had the feeling that the band was
open at times but nobody was giving it a try.
Apologies to the USA op in the NAQP who thought I was calling
him on 40 when I dumped my call in on a YO. I worked the YO,
of course, but a couple KHz away I could hear the USA fellow,
whose call I didn't get, asking me for my name and state.
Sorry, I don't do the NAQP or HF sprints.
Very 73,
Fred Laun, K3ZO
>From jbwolf at most.magec.com (James B. Wolf) Thu Aug 10 17:40:47 1995
From: jbwolf at most.magec.com (James B. Wolf) (James B. Wolf)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 11:40:47 -0500
Subject: TopBand: Type of wire for...
Message-ID: <9508101642.AA22377 at ss4.uiv>
>>
>> Don't forget that as the frequency decreases the skin effect also decreases.
>> Steel wire (electric fence wire) has poor conductivity.
>> And since the coating may or may not last on a steel coated wire, along with
>> the fact that skin effect is poor at 160 meters, I would dismiss any kind of
>> steel wire for beverages.
>>
>> Jim, KR9U
>
>I disagree. A Beverage has a high voltage (therefore low current)
>induced. low current = low loss. I've used 17 ga electric fence wire for
>several years for a Beverage and am very pleased with performance. Also
>it's real cheap - about $10 for 1/2 mile at Agway. 73
>Barry N. Kutner, W2UP
>---------------------------
>Actually, you have it backwards. The higher the frequency, the more
>pronounced the skin effect as the current is confined to thinner and
>thinner regions near the outside of the conductor. At DC, the current
>flows through the entire conductor.
>
>73, Ward N0AX
>
Let me say it this way.
Since Steel wire is magnetic, its losses at AC are greater than at DC.
Being magnetic it has a permeability which makes the skin depth smaller. So
at AC we
really have two reasons that the losses are greater. It's magnetic property
and it's
restitivity. Depending on frequency its losses can be at much as 20 times
higher than copper in the HF bands.
If I get time I could go through the numbers at 160 meters.
Jim, KR9U
--------------------------------------
James B. Wolf Phone:219-429-4638
Mail Stop:25-71 Fax:8215 Email: jbwolf at most.magec.com
MESC, 1313 Production Road, Fort Wayne, IN 46808
>From n2ic at drmail.dr.att.com (LondonSM) Thu Aug 10 16:54:53 1995
From: n2ic at drmail.dr.att.com (LondonSM) (LondonSM)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 09:54:53 -0600
Subject: QSYing
References: <199508101407.HAA18186 at cascade.cmicro.com>
Message-ID: <9508100954.ZM5589 at dr.att.com>
On Aug 10, 7:07am, Larry Tyree wrote:
>
> So, it gets down to a personal choice which frequency to use.
> I personally like to use something above the normal activity. Maybe
> 060 is a good choice. If we used a standard frequency for this type of
> thing (or range of frequencies), maybe some people will just listen there.
> It is always fun to follow two stations and work both of them.
>
> Tree N6TR
>-- End of excerpt from Larry Tyree
Personally, I would rather not use a standard frequency. The point of moving a
multiplier is to work a multiplier that, perhaps, my competition won't work. I
found the guy on band X, and was savvy enough to move him/her to band Y. I
don't want my competitors to freeload on my efforts.
This is a contest, after all. If you want to freeload, stick to DX nets !
Steve, N2IC/0
n2ic at dr.att.com
>From McCarty, DK 'Dav" <DKMC at chevron.com Thu Aug 10 17:51:09 1995
From: McCarty, DK 'Dav" <DKMC at chevron.com (McCarty, DK 'Dav)
Date: 10 Aug 1995 09:51:09 PDT
Subject: To Move or Not To Move
Message-ID: <CPLAN065.DKMC.025351090095222FCPLAN065 at ION.CHEVRON.COM>
From: McCarty, DK 'David'
To: OPEN ADDRESSING SERVI-OPENADDR
Subject: Re: To Move or Not To Move
Date: 1995-08-10 11:31
Priority:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tree,
If we all use the same freq, think of the confusion when we all fire up on
top of one another. When I am asking a guy to move, the first thing I do is
start listening for a good clear spot; usually NOT 050, but high in the band
to get away from the crowd, or low in the band if it is a stateside station
with an Extra Class license (or a VE, for example).
Another key point that ought to be mentioned is that the usual practice for
getting together on the target band is that the specified frequency is a
starting point, if it is busy you move UP the band--not down--and the asking
station is the one who chooses the clear spot and calls the other guy.
Dave K5GN
dkmc at chevron.com
BTW I had trouble in NAQP moving people to 10M until I figured out that the
S-Line VFO lost 0.5KC of calibration in the first 5 KC up from the marker
signal at 28.00000 ... which meant I was calling *below* the intended
rendezvous point.
----------
>From: TREE
>To: DKMC
>Subject: QSYing
>Date: Thursday, August 10, 1995 10:34AM
>
>To: cq-contest at tgv.com
>
>Subject: QSYing
>
>There are several techniques used to QSY to another band. Some people
>assume you are going to stay on your same frequency but on the new
>band (ie: 14045 -> 21045 -> 28045). Others will pick a frequency
>likely to be clear (ie: up the band around 050 or 060).
>
>In the old days before the rigs had a memory of the frequency you were
>last on, the first method was perferred. Now with computer frequency
>control, the quickest way to QSY is to type in the new frequency.
>
>This gets more complicated if the band you are going to is serviced by
>a second radio. And if that radio is a C line without digital display,
>and maybe the crystal for that band is off a little from the others...
>
>One tool we could use from the old CW traffic nets is the G signal that
>indicates we are going to be turning our bandswitch in the next second.
>It is a short version of GG, meaning you are going to QSY.
>
>So, it gets down to a personal choice which frequency to use.
>I personally like to use something above the normal activity. Maybe
>060 is a good choice. If we used a standard frequency for this type of
>thing (or range of frequencies), maybe some people will just listen there.
>It is always fun to follow two stations and work both of them.
>
>Tree N6TR
>
>From De Syam <syam at Glue.umd.edu> Thu Aug 10 18:04:30 1995
From: De Syam <syam at Glue.umd.edu> (De Syam)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 13:04:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: K3ZO's "don't ask first" philosophy
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950810124447.5067G-100000 at latte.eng.umd.edu>
On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, N2IC wrote:
> On a more sarcastic note, it was really gratifying to note in the NAQP how
> quickly K3ZO's "don't ask first" philosophy has spread within the contest
> community. Really appreciated the "CQ NA" dumped on top of my 10 meter QSO's,
> who were, no doubt, within the skip zone of the offender.
>
I had not intended to belabor the subject further, but having seen my
call used perjoratively, I rise to my defense with the following points:
1) Apparently from the way I worded my original remarks, many people did
not notice that I said that I always listen to a frequency carefully for
several seconds before trying to use it, and that if it becomes obvious
that it indeed was in use, I move.
2) In my first ten years of contesting, frequency fights were unknown. I
would like to get back to that tradition.
3) Asking "QRL?" is the lazy man's way of determining whether a frequency
is in use. This impatient contester is unwilling to take the time to
listen carefully to see if the frequency is really in use so he calls
"QRL?" immediately upon landing there. If he does not receive a
"politically correct" response, he considers the frequency to be "his"
even though it becomes obvious that it really was in use. ("Well, I
asked and nobody said it was in use.") So then the issue becomes NOT
whether the frequency was really in use or not, but whether the person
using it responded in the proper manner. This is progress?
I was not in the NAQP so I was not a witness to what happened, but N2IC
can rest assured that I would never do to him what he complained about!
Very 73,
Fred Laun, K3ZO
>From SELBREDE%ARIA-2.EDW at mhs.elan.af.mil (Bob Selbrede) Thu Aug 10 17:57:00 1995
From: SELBREDE%ARIA-2.EDW at mhs.elan.af.mil (Bob Selbrede) (Bob Selbrede)
Date: 10 Aug 95 09:57:00 PDT
Subject: NAQP SSB Contest Records
References: <11CE283002A1D0D1 at -SMF->
Message-ID: <6CBD293001A1D0D1 at -SMF->
Hi All,
Listed below are the NAQP SSB Contest Records for the last 11 contests.
The start date of January 1991 was chosen because the current rules were
put into effect at that time. I thought these might be of interest to many
the NAQP enthusiasts out there who are planning for the upcoming NAQP SSB
Contest, August 19th. These records were compiled from published results
(Jan 95 SSB results will be in the Sep/Oct NCJ) and corrections should be
sent to me for future updates. I hope the formatting of this data doesn't
get too messed up in the translation. I'll post the CW Records next, if
this goes well.
73, Bob W9NQ
********************************
NAQP SSB RECORDS Compiled by Bob Selbrede, W9NQ
(Records are based upon published scores from Jan 91 through Jan 95)
SINGLE OPERATOR RECORDS:
AREA CALL SCORE YEAR
CT K8HVT/1 90,552 01/93
MA KA1IG 95,325 01/93
ME KN1M 76,560 01/91
NH WR1L 102,752 01/92
RI WZ1R 137,555 01/92
VT WT1L 148,856 01/92
NJ WA2MKM 74,358 01/93
NY N2BA (K8HVT) 149,100 01/92
DE WN3K 124,410 08/94
MD KA3VYN 75,465 01/92
PA WR3G 246,339 01/92
AL AA4UF 90,000 08/94
FL K4XS 174,720 01/91
GA KM9P/4 246,018 01/92
KY KB4SRE 111,502 01/92
NC N4AA 103,350 01/91
SC N4ZC (KI4HN) 110,466 01/95
TN N4ZZ 201,664 01/95
VA K7SV/4 119,098 01/95
AR KI5BV 44,250 01/94
LA W5WMU 83,578 08/94
MS N5KKG 16,247 08/93
NM AA5B 279,565 01/92
OK N5CG 197,340 01/92
TX N5RZ 242,928 01/91
CA N6UR (KR6X) 303,563 01/93
HI No Logs Submitted
AK KL7FAP 4,576 08/93
AZ K6LL/7 300,150 01/94
ID KE7UH 44,352 01/91
MT N9ITX/7 169,892 01/95
NV KI3V/7 160,080 08/93
OR N7MMQ 70,119 01/94
UT WE7B 88,872 01/92
WA K7QQ 212,520 01/93
WY WC7S 57,081 01/91
MI WA8ZDT 234,362 01/94
OH KW8N 165,220 01/95
WV N8II 143,850 01/93
IL WB9TIY 161,330 01/92
IN W9RE 70,000 01/91
WI KA9FOX 229,934 01/92
CO K0GU 244,571 01/95
IA N0AXL 100,810 01/95
KS N0BIW 59,736 01/95
MN KB0LC 113,274 01/91
MO AA0CR 119,504 01/93
ND ND1H/0 80,785 01/94
NE KV0I 107,820 01/91
SD WD0T 181,376 01/93
VE1 VE1MQ 27,120 01/91
VE2 VE2AWR 3,872 08/94
VE3 VE3EJ 187,682 01/95
VE4 VE4VV 189,620 01/94
VE5 VE5MX 99,372 01/94
VE6 VE6JY 65,351 01/94
VE7 VE7CV 106,554 01/92
VE8 No Logs Submitted
VO1 No Logs Submitted
VO2 No Logs Submitted
VY1 VY1JA 14,756 08/94
VY2 VY2SS 115,040 01/93
KP4 W8HNI/KP4 9,652 01/93
PY PY2LI 12,600 08/92
TG TG9AJR 29,082 01/92
VP2E VP2EXX 18,620 01/91
VP5 VP5V 213,110 01/93
VP9 WA1AWJ/VP9 7,920 01/92
XE XE1/AA6RX 141,575 01/95
ZF ZF2NE/ZF9 8,800 08/94
TOP 10 SINGLE OPERATOR SCORES:
CALL SCORE YEAR
N6UR (KR6X) 303,563 01/93
K6LL/7 300,150 01/94
AA5B 279,565 01/92
K4XS 277,728 01/93
W6UE (KA6SAR) 257,296 01/92
WR3G 246,339 01/92
KM9P/4 246,018 01/91
K0GU 244,571 01/95
N5RZ 242,928 01/91
K0GU 238,389 01/94
MOST QSO'S: K6LL/7, 1305 QSO's, 01/94
MOST MULT'S: WR3G, 271 Mult's, 01/92
TOP 3 MULTI OPERATOR SCORES:
CALL SCORE YEAR
WB5VZL 598,404 01/94
W0AIH 463,681 01/94
KW8N 438,212 01/94
TOP 3 TEAM SCORES:
NAME SCORE YEAR
SCCC
(N6UR, W9NQ, W6UQF, KJ6HO, KI6VC) 764,704 01/93
Sultans Of Shwing #1
(K0GU, WD0T, WB9TIY, N4ZC, N0BSH) 721,772 01/95
SCCC
(K6LL, AB6FO, KJ6HO, WA7BNM) 654,064 01/94
>From McCarty, DK 'Dav" <DKMC at chevron.com Thu Aug 10 18:27:10 1995
From: McCarty, DK 'Dav" <DKMC at chevron.com (McCarty, DK 'Dav)
Date: 10 Aug 1995 10:27:10 PDT
Subject: NAQP CW SCORES (v.3)
Message-ID: <CPLAN065.DKMC.291927100095222FCPLAN065 at ION.CHEVRON.COM>
From: McCarty, DK 'David'
To: OPEN ADDRESSING SERVI-OPENADDR
Subject: NAQP CW SCORES (v.3)
Date: 1995-08-10 12:08
Priority:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another update with all posts received to-date.
Repeating an earlier question: what are the team and
individual records for the NAQP CW?
--GN
updates to dkmc at chevron.com
NAQP CW AUGUST 1995
TEAMS:
Texas DX Society #1 K5GA, K5GN, K7UP, AD5Q, W5ASP 620,694
Florida Contest Group K1ZX, AC4NJ, AC1O/4, WD4AHZ, NP4Z 585K
INDIVIDUALS:
CALL QSOS MULT SCORE BREAKDOWN
N5RP 360 ? ?
N4RJ(KM9P) 550 ? ?
W4NT(KM9P) 550 ? ?
NP4Z 530 ? ?
K5GA 690 217 149,730 21/10 56/29 177/45 208/50 124/47 104/36
K1ZX 704 212 149,248 26/13 77/31 184/45 228/51 136/47 53/25
N4ZZ 700 202 141,400
K0RF 718 196 140,728 14/8 36/22 138/42 257/48 130/38 143/38
K5GN 648 213 138,024 18/10 39/25 93/35 217/50 156/45 129/44
AC4NJ (WC4E) 637 206 131,222 28/15 80/31 132/40 200/47 135/45 62/38
KC5NWX 566 229 129,614
K7UP(KN5H) 624 207 129,168 5/5 63/27 143/45 208/47 109/42 96/42
AD5Q 630 193 121,590 16/8 61/25 155/43 219/49 107/39 72/29
K0EJ 599 195 116,805
AC1O/4 620 188 116,560
AB6FO 573 198 113,454 8/6 45/23 135/42 193/48 108/42 84/37
KF0H 548 206 112,880
K7SV 534 205 109,470 28/15 82/40 124/46 158/44 87/35 55/25
W5NN(KB5YVT) 551 188 103,588 6/5 64/30 147/41 159/45 114/39 61/28
W1WEF 580 179 103,280 11/7 56/25 167/42 197/44 97/34 52/27
K6LL 559 183 102,297 7/4 42/19 129/40 188/48 105/38 88/34
K4PQL 563 179 100,777 27/17 71/29 149/39 198/46 84/34 34/14
KI3L 535 134 98,440
WA2SRQ 569 173 98,437 24/12 99/33 140/39 205/44 66/27 35/18
K4AMC 552 177 97,704
N6ZZ 524 177 92,748 0/0 38/24 108/36 167/43 112/38 99/36
WD4AHZ 519 175 90,825
W5ASP 502 162 82,000
AA0OB 490 158 77,420 0/0 23/15 114/36 178/41 95/34 80/32
NJ9C 503 150 75,450
N5NMX 457 162 74,034
KC4ZV 443 166 73,548
KE7GH 499 133 66,367 0/0 21/10 128/42 270/49 80/32 0/0
W9WI 476 135 64,260
W1IHN 420 151 63,420 23/16 66/30 154/41 143/43 27/16 7/5
WR3O 423 143 60,489 12/9 84/31 110/36 148/37 59/26 10/4
WA5JWU 415 145 60,175 12/7 42/19 143/40 125/34 65/28 28/17
AA4NC 388 151 58,588 14/10 47/26 79/34 158/44 55/22 35/15
K8NZ 386 151 58,286 20/13 56/28 126/38 102/35 43/19 39/18
K6XO 400 143 57,200
ND3F 394 144 56,700
K7NPN 393 142 55,806 0/0 11/4 75/35 174/43 81/36 51/24
K3TLX 350 152 53,200 10/10 76/31 95/39 95/39 44/19 30/14
AC4ZO 355 125 44,375 8/6 49/23 101/35 156/40 26/14 15/7
KO9Y 325 130 42,250
WQ5L 318 123 39,114 0/0 54/25 132/37 101/39 29/20 2/2
N8AAT 285 132 37,620 4/4 55/29 86/36 76/34 37/16 27/13
N4TQO 294 124 36,456
K5WA 267 123 32,841
AE2T 287 113 32,431 0/0 83/28 79/34 74/29 39/14 12/8
AE0M 261 113 29,493 0/0 34/18 97/40 91/37 30/14 9/4
N0AXL 215 ? 24,000
K8MR 213 91 19,383 7/6 46/25 13/9 81/29 54/17 12/5
NG3K 206 82 16,892 0/0 21/13 91/32 92/35 0/0 2/2
K5RC 177 82 14,154
WA7BNM 129 81 10,449 3/3 23/15 36/22 25/18 18/13 24/10
AA7BG 107 65 6,955 0/0 11/7 17/10 29/18 21/13 29/17
K1TN 107 64 6,848 0/0 25/14 15/12 44/24 17/10 6/4
K9MA 100 63 6,300 5/4 27/17 28/19 38/21 2/2 0/0
WN3K 109 57 6,213
WA6OTU 103 ? 6,077
KD0AV 96 61 5,856 0/0 17/12 41/25 31/18 6/5 1/1
W9SZ 89 51 4,539 0/0 9/9 40/21 40/21 0/0 0/0
K8JP 73 51 3,723 14/13 41/25 18/18 0/0 0/0 0/0
AA8SM 77 43 3,311 0/0 35/22 0/0 42/21 0/0 0/0
WU1F 80 41 3,280
K8JP 73 ? 3,162
>From jholly at hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback) Thu Aug 10 18:36:20 1995
From: jholly at hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback) (Jim Hollenback)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 10:36:20 -0700
Subject: K3ZO's "don't ask first" philosophy
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950810124447.5067G-100000 at latte.eng.umd.edu>
Message-ID: <9508101036.ZM29797 at hpwsmjh1.cup.hp.com>
On Aug 10, 1:04pm, De Syam wrote:
> Subject: Re: K3ZO's "don't ask first" philosophy
>
> 2) In my first ten years of contesting, frequency fights were unknown. I
> would like to get back to that tradition.
>
Amen ... however, what about the two radio crowd that was off on another
band working the mult and now comes back to what you thought was a clear
frequency but he considers it his run frequency? instant war ... push
that F1 again. Progress is a neat thing.
> 3) Asking "QRL?" is the lazy man's way of determining whether a frequency
> is in use.
And if someone else was sizing up the frequecny you can bet he will say
yes and promptly start CQing.
>From jesposit at sctcorp.com (Joe Esposito) Thu Aug 10 18:50:00 1995
From: jesposit at sctcorp.com (Joe Esposito) (Joe Esposito)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 13:50 EDT
Subject: 1995 NAQP CW Score
Message-ID: <m0sgbku-0003azC at sctladm.sctcorp.com>
Call: K2YJL/M Class: Single Op, single band
Mode: CW Location: Wilmore, KY
Score: 25 QSOs X 9 States = 225 points
Time: 1 hour, 51 minutes
Comments: Decent condx to SW and W. No propagation at all to NE.
I hadn't really planned to operate this one but could
not resist after hearing strong sigs on 10 meters.
Rig: Uniden HR-2510 mounted in 1990 Olds running 25 watts into a
Hamstick. QTH was a hill-top on a farm in rural KY.
73,
Joe, K2YJL/M
>From n6ig at netcom.com (Jim Pratt) Thu Aug 10 18:51:58 1995
From: n6ig at netcom.com (Jim Pratt) (Jim Pratt)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 10:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: K3ZO's "don't ask first" philosophy
Message-ID: <199508101751.KAA12872 at netcom4.netcom.com>
>
> And if someone else was sizing up the frequecny you can bet he will say
> yes and promptly start CQing.
>
>
Hey, be quiet; that's my trick! :.>
73, N6IG
>From ken at packetcluster.com (Ken Wolff) Thu Aug 10 22:07:01 1995
From: ken at packetcluster.com (Ken Wolff) (Ken Wolff)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 14:07:01 PDT
Subject: K1EA returns to the internet
Message-ID: <19950810140701.0aaca900.in at server>
I am finally back on the internet with a slightly different address. It is
now ken or k1ea at packetcluster.com. The old domain name
was packetclustr, without the 'e'.
Ken Wolff (ken at packetcluster.com)
>From Jeff Steinman <Jeff.Steinman.0247501 at nt.com> Thu Aug 10 18:01:58 1995
From: Jeff Steinman <Jeff.Steinman.0247501 at nt.com> (Jeff Steinman)
Date: 10 Aug 1995 13:01:58 -0400
Subject: Shakespere on Multipliers
Message-ID: <n1404055991.13407 at nrchq1.rich1.nt.com>
Subject: Time: 12:32
PM
OFFICE MEMO Shakespere on Multipliers Date:
8/10/95
"To move or not to move, that is the question" ?
KN5H brings up an interesting point. I can understand his viewpoint, and
those of others who are always being asked to QSY, although living in
Texas it is rare to be asked to QSY. :-)
Someone made a good suggestion about making skeds. It's a good way to
have a pileup waiting for you on a freq. The only potential trouble is
that propagation could change and when you do QSY, you waste time
calling CQ and getting no/little answers. I asked K7UP to move on 2
occasions in the NAQP and Steve obliged both times. The first was from
40 to 20 to 10, taking maybe 90 seconds total. The second was from 160
to 80, taking maybe a minute. It's hard to say if Steve lost rate due to
obliging my requests. As I recall he had many calling on 40, but I asked
anyway. It costs ZERO to ask and being in sales I'm used to "NO". Thanks
for obliging, Steve!
As far as "losing your run frequency" I don't know that I have ever
heard the bands so crowded in the NAQP that you can't find a hole.
That's one of the reasons hopping around is so fun and relatively risk
free, unlike CQWW where there is a lot more VALUE to a [clear] run
frequency than NAQP.
Steve made a point that he was very active on all bands and that others
SHOULD have been able to find him when he was on a band, rather than
having to ask for a QSY later. If I would have had my second radio wired
in, then yes, I probably would have asked fewer people to QSY because
they would have been in the log. Even with 2 radios you can't be
everywhere all the time.
58 of my 566 QSOs (and 58 of 229 multipliers) were the direct result of
a QSY. Those 58 QSOs came about from 32 QSY events, as often I was able
to move a station to 4 or 5 bands. I probably had another half dozen
move attempts that didn't pan out. One of the tricks in August is
deciding the order to QSY, as you want to maximize the multipliers from
the move. I recall many stations got progressively louder as we went
from 20 to 15 to 10 LATE in the contest. I don't think there is a
better/easier operating event for moving people, i.e., making a BIG
impact on your score, than the NAQP.
BTW, at this time my radio/antennas are still under manual control. Hope
to have that straightened out by January !
73
Jeff KR0Y
>From SELBREDE%ARIA-2.EDW at mhs.elan.af.mil (Bob Selbrede) Thu Aug 10 20:10:00 1995
From: SELBREDE%ARIA-2.EDW at mhs.elan.af.mil (Bob Selbrede) (Bob Selbrede)
Date: 10 Aug 95 12:10:00 PDT
Subject: NAQP CW Contest Records
References: <11CE283002A1D0D1 at -SMF->
Message-ID: <94F2293001A1D0D1 at -SMF->
Hi All,
Listed below are the NAQP CW Contest Records for the last 11 contests.
The start date of January 1991 was chosen because the current rules were put
into effect at that time. These records were compiled from published
results and corrections should be sent to me for future updates.
73, Bob W9NQ
********************************
NAQP CW RECORDS Compiled by Bob Selbrede, W9NQ
(Records are based upon published scores from Jan 91 through Jan 95)
SINGLE OPERATOR RECORDS:
AREA CALL SCORE YEAR
CT K8HVT/1 125,424 01/91
MA K5ZD/1 90,300 08/93
ME NY1E 81,096 01/91
NH K1DG (WZ1R) 122,664 01/93
RI WZ1R 70,470 01/92
VT N4DW/1 53,040 08/93
NJ KZ2S 226,530 01/91
NY KA2AEV 100,648 01/91
DE N8NA/3 76,300 01/93
MD KN5H/3 101,436 01/93
PA K3WW 145,555 01/91
AL K4IQJ 118,768 01/92
FL K4XS 158,828 01/91
GA KM9P/4 229,015 01/93
KY N4OGW 130,628 01/93
NC K4PQL 131,440 01/94
SC K0EJ/4 146,268 01/93
TN K4LTA 118,992 01/93
VA W4XD 69,372 01/92
AR KM5G 101,184 01/94
LA W5WMU (K5GA) 127,308 08/94
MS W5XX 130,092 01/93
NM AA5B 159,495 01/92
OK N5CG 133,570 01/91
TX N5RZ 204,050 01/92
CA N6UR (KR6X) 209,108 01/93
HI AH6JF 9,490 08/94
AK K6NA/KL7 2,847 08/91
AZ K6LL/7 191,590 01/91
ID WO7Y 93,055 01/94
MT No Logs Submitted
NV KZ4H/7 34,122 01/91
OR AA7NX 70,642 01/93
UT WE7B 122,688 01/91
WA N0AX/7 137,340 01/94
WY WC7S 58,656 01/94
MI N8EA 98,886 01/91
OH K8NZ 142,500 01/91
WV N8II 47,275 01/94
IL AG9A 147,180 01/91
IN NJ9C 117,312 01/91
WI W9UP 134,408 01/94
CO N2IC/0 225,502 01/93
IA KF0H 89,890 08/94
KS KM0L 34,102 01/92
MN KS0T 79,365 01/93
MO KM0L 96,720 01/93
ND WB0O 121,568 01/93
NE KV0I 133,666 01/91
SD WD0T 174,384 01/93
VE1 VE1BN 8,378 01/94
VE2 VE2LID 30,849 01/93
VE3 VE3EJ 19,296 08/91
VE4 VE4VV 143,412 01/93
VE5 VE5SF 26,418 01/94
VE6 VE6UX 117,370 01/93
VE7 VE7QO 37,504 01/93
VE8 No Logs Submitted
VO1 VO1SF 33,536 01/93
VO2 No Logs Submitted
VY1 VY1JA 3,848 08/94
VY2 VY2SS 64,124 01/92
G G3FXB 23,331 08/92
HH HH2PK 56,991 01/93
HI HI8DMX 20,984 01/91
JA 7J1AAI (K8HVT) 280 08/92
PY PY2NY 450 01/92
VP2E VP2EXX 5,880 01/91
XE XE1/NV1P 62,196 08/91
ZD8 ZD8Z 20,124 08/92
TOP 10 SINGLE OPERATOR SCORES:
CALL SCORE YEAR
KM9P/4 229,015 01/93
KZ2S 226,530 01/91
N2IC/0 225,502 01/93
KM9P/4 217,198 01/91
N6UR (KR6X) 209,108 01/93
KM9P/4 205,646 01/92
N5RZ 204,050 01/92
N5RZ 202,184 01/91
N5RZ 200,136 01/94
N5RZ 194,740 01/93
MOST QSO'S: N6UR (KR6X), 857 QSO's, 01/93
MOST MULT'S: KM9P/4, 281 Mult's, 01/93
TOP 3 MULTI OPERATOR SCORES:
CALL SCORE YEAR
AA5B 284,532 01/93
K4XS 259,548 01/93
K5OJI 191,037 01/93
TOP 3 TEAM SCORES:
NAME SCORE YEAR
Team Quatro
(KM9P, K4XS, WC4E, K4BAI, K0LUZ) 778,780 01/91
SCCC
(N6UR, K6LL, W6AQ, AB6FO, W9NQ) 756,237 01/93
FRC
(KZ2S, K3WW, K2TW, KA2AEV, W2GD) 654,237 01/91
>From Ken Silverman" <ken.silverman at CCMAIL.AirTouch.COM Thu Aug 10 19:53:10 1995
From: Ken Silverman" <ken.silverman at CCMAIL.AirTouch.COM (Ken Silverman)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 10:53:10 PST
Subject: Re[2]: To Move or Not To Move
Message-ID: <9507108080.AA808088485 at CCMAIL.AIRTOUCH.COM>
> K5GN says: If we all use the same freq, think of the confusion when
we all fire up ontop of one another.
Whats so terrible about that?
While on Dxpeditions, I often move mults to 060. Its amazing on how
many other people would move mults to that freq. I worked a memorable
amount of mults that way - just bumping into them as I was moving
people myself.
If I was manning the mult station (M/S), I would also pay special
attention to those freqs since I knew people would move their mults
there.
"One persons garbage freq may be worth a million points to another"
Ken WM2C
>From R. Torsten Clay" <torsten at mephisto.physics.uiuc.edu Thu Aug 10 22:24:54 1995
From: R. Torsten Clay" <torsten at mephisto.physics.uiuc.edu (R. Torsten Clay)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 16:24:54 CDT
Subject: To Move or Not to Move
Message-ID: <199508102124.AA00643 at mephisto.physics.uiuc.edu>
>
>
> > K5GN says: If we all use the same freq, think of the confusion when
> we all fire up ontop of one another.
>
etc...
Sometimes in NAQP I've heard guys setting up a move and followed them, or
listened up the band (.040/.050/.060). Picked up some new mults that way...
Tor
n4ogw at uiuc.edu
>From Bob Schreibmaier" <k2ph at dxis.monroe.pa.us Thu Aug 10 22:03:48 1995
From: Bob Schreibmaier" <k2ph at dxis.monroe.pa.us (Bob Schreibmaier)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 17:03:48 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: K3ZO's "don't ask first" philosophy
Message-ID: <m0sgelb-0003eMC at dxis.monroe.pa.us>
> > And if someone else was sizing up the frequecny you can bet he will say
> > yes and promptly start CQing.
> >
> Hey, be quiet; that's my trick! :.>
I'm pretty sure that's EVERYBODY'S trick! 8^{)
73,
Bob K2PH
--
+------------------ \-\-\-\ -----------------------------+
| Bob Schreibmaier K2PH | INTERNET: k2ph at dxis.monroe.pa.us |
| (a.k.a. "The QRPer") | ICBM: 40o55'N 75o30'W |
| Kresgeville, PA | Euthanize the Limbaugh Loonies. |
+----------------------------------------------------------+
>From SELBREDE%ARIA-2.EDW at mhs.elan.af.mil (Bob Selbrede) Thu Aug 10 20:36:00 1995
From: SELBREDE%ARIA-2.EDW at mhs.elan.af.mil (Bob Selbrede) (Bob Selbrede)
Date: 10 Aug 95 12:36:00 PDT
Subject: NAQP CW Contest Records (Corrected)
References: <11CE283002A1D0D1 at -SMF->
Message-ID: <72F6293001A1D0D1 at -SMF->
Hi Again,
I accidently hit the "send" button when I shouldn't have. This posting
has the correct records info attached. Please disregard my earlier post.
Sorry for the unnecessary bandwidth!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Listed below are the NAQP CW Contest Records for the last 11 contests.
The start date of January 1991 was chosen because the current rules were put
into effect at that time. These records were compiled from published
results and corrections should be sent to me for future updates.
73, Bob W9NQ
********************************
NAQP CW RECORDS Compiled by Bob Selbrede, W9NQ
(Records are based upon published scores from Jan 91 through Jan 95)
SINGLE OPERATOR RECORDS:
AREA CALL SCORE YEAR
CT K8HVT/1 125,424 01/91
MA K5ZD/1 90,300 08/93
ME NY1E 81,096 01/91
NH K1DG (WZ1R) 122,664 01/93
RI WZ1R 70,470 01/92
VT N4DW/1 53,040 08/93
NJ KZ2S 226,530 01/91
NY KA2AEV 100,648 01/91
DE N8NA/3 76,300 01/93
MD KN5H/3 101,436 01/93
PA K3WW 145,555 01/91
AL K4IQJ 118,768 01/92
FL K4XS 158,828 01/91
GA KM9P/4 229,015 01/93
KY N4OGW 130,628 01/93
NC K4PQL 131,440 01/94
SC K0EJ/4 146,268 01/93
TN N4ZZ 139,195 01/95
VA K7SV/4 88,528 01/95
AR KM5G 107,156 01/95
LA W5WMU (K5GA) 131,253 01/95
MS W5XX 130,092 01/93
NM AA5B 159,495 01/92
OK N5CG 133,570 01/91
TX N5RZ 204,050 01/92
CA N6UR (KR6X) 209,108 01/93
HI AH6JF 9,490 08/94
AK K6NA/KL7 2,847 08/91
AZ K6LL/7 191,590 01/91
ID W7ZRC 99,372 01/95
MT No Logs Submitted
NV KZ4H/7 34,122 01/91
OR AA7NX 70,642 01/93
UT WE7B 122,688 01/91
WA N0AX/7 137,340 01/94
WY WC7S 58,656 01/94
MI N8EA 98,886 01/91
OH K8NZ 142,500 01/91
WV N8II 47,275 01/94
IL AG9A 147,180 01/91
IN NJ9C 117,312 01/91
WI W9UP 134,408 01/94
CO N2IC/0 225,502 01/93
IA KF0H 89,890 08/94
KS KM0L 34,102 01/92
MN KS0T 79,365 01/93
MO KM0L 96,720 01/93
ND WB0O 121,568 01/93
NE KV0I 133,666 01/91
SD WD0T 174,384 01/93
VE1 VE1BN 8,378 01/94
VE2 VE2LID 30,849 01/93
VE3 VE3EJ 19,296 08/91
VE4 VE4VV 143,412 01/93
VE5 VE5SF 26,418 01/94
VE6 VE6UX 117,370 01/93
VE7 VE7QO 43,542 01/93
VE8 No Logs Submitted
VO1 VO1SF 33,536 01/93
VO2 No Logs Submitted
VY1 VY1JA 3,848 08/94
VY2 VY2SS 64,124 01/92
G G3FXB 23,331 08/92
HH HH2PK 56,991 01/93
HI HI8DMX 20,984 01/91
JA 7J1AAI (K8HVT) 280 08/92
OH OH3JF 36 01/95
PY PY2NY 450 01/92
VP2E VP2EXX 5,880 01/91
XE XE1/NV1P 62,196 08/91
ZD8 ZD8Z 20,124 08/92
TOP 10 SINGLE OPERATOR SCORES:
CALL SCORE YEAR
KM9P/4 229,015 01/93
KZ2S 226,530 01/91
N2IC/0 225,502 01/93
KM9P/4 217,198 01/91
N6UR (KR6X) 209,108 01/93
KM9P/4 205,646 01/92
N5RZ 204,050 01/92
N5RZ 202,184 01/91
N5RZ 200,136 01/94
N5RZ 194,740 01/93
MOST QSO'S: N6UR (KR6X), 857 QSO's, 01/93
MOST MULT'S: KM9P/4, 281 Mult's, 01/93
TOP 3 MULTI OPERATOR SCORES:
CALL SCORE YEAR
AA5B 284,532 01/93
K4XS 259,548 01/93
K5OJI 191,037 01/93
TOP 3 TEAM SCORES:
NAME SCORE YEAR
Team Quatro
(KM9P, K4XS, WC4E, K4BAI, K0LUZ) 778,780 01/91
SCCC
(N6UR, K6LL, W6AQ, AB6FO, W9NQ) 756,237 01/93
FRC
(KZ2S, K3WW, K2TW, KA2AEV, W2GD) 654,237 01/91
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list