WAE Phone - GB5HQ
/G=LAWLEYD/S=LAWLEY/PRMD=IBMMAIL/ADMD=IBMX400/C=GB/ at mhs-relay.ac.uk
/G=LAWLEYD/S=LAWLEY/PRMD=IBMMAIL/ADMD=IBMX400/C=GB/ at mhs-relay.ac.uk
Fri Sep 15 10:18:09 EDT 1995
Here is the raw score for GB5HQ in WAE phone, multi-single:
QSOs QTCs Mults
80 45 30 64
40 158 107 105
20 614 443 110
15 37 47 42
10 13 15 12
--- --- ---
867 642 333 Total=484,182
Yaesu FT1000 + Explorer amp (pair 3-500zg)
TH6 up 90ft
402CD up 70ft
80m delta loop, apex up 85ft
FT1000 + Butternut and Dunestar filters for spotting
Comments
Extremely poor conditions - no Ws on 40 on the first night - made it hard
to compete but we achieved the objective of demonstrating a modern contest
station to convention visitors. The packet link was solid for 48 hours, PC
networking worked a treat as did the rig control. We had a huge VGA monitor
on the third PC and could demonstrate to visitors all the contest logging
features.
Thanks to all who gave us QTCs and especially on Sunday evening when
conditions to the US started to recover. A number of guys said they had
no QTCs right now but would go and get some then come back to our run
frequency when they had ten for us.
We thought it would be indelicate to ask XR0Y for QTCs on 80m.
Thanks are due to SMC Ltd, Linear Amp UK, Yaesu UK, G3OZF, Verulam ARC and
South Notts ARC for the loan of equipment to make the operation possible.
Operators/helpers were G3OZF G3TXF G3VHB G3ZAY G4BUO G4HTD G4JGV G4JVG
G4TSH GW4VEQ G0MFO(AA6MC) G0OPB G0ORH G0UHK(NZ1W)
QSL via RSGB
73, Dave G4BUO
>From De Syam <syam at Glue.umd.edu> Fri Sep 15 13:39:03 1995
From: De Syam <syam at Glue.umd.edu> (De Syam)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 08:39:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: ARRL DX results
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950915083544.1429A-100000 at cappuccino.eng.umd.edu>
As long as we are engaged in a microscopic examination of the ARRL DX
Contest results and writeup, is there any reason to keep calling the
listing of Maryland scores "Maryland-DC" when the DC scores are broken
out separately and listed under "District of Columbia"?
Very 73,
Fred Laun, K3ZO
>From joe.ham at ctobbs.com (Joe Ham) Thu Sep 14 13:51:18 1995
From: joe.ham at ctobbs.com (Joe Ham) (Joe Ham)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 12:51:18 GMT
Subject: Contest Club Update Request
Message-ID: <9509150621412118 at ctobbs.com>
John,
Cops Contest Club (five years old and now in process of becomming ARRL
affiliated.) Made up of police officer hams and RACES/ARES folks who
assist law enforcement AND who are involved in contesting. Centered in
East Bay (San Francisco) area and comprised of about 25 members. Mail
via KG6LF, Jerry Boyd, P.O. Box 2701 Martinez, Ca. 94553.
73
Jerry
KG6LF
>From sellington" <sellington at mail.ssec.wisc.edu Fri Sep 15 14:39:22 1995
From: sellington" <sellington at mail.ssec.wisc.edu (sellington)
Date: 15 Sep 1995 08:39:22 -0500
Subject: Cryogenic radio?
Message-ID: <n1400968062.49682 at mail.ssec.wisc.edu>
There was a demonstration of the noise-addition technique on NPR a few
months ago. It was quite impressive. I'm not sure how valuable it
would be for HF signal detection, however, since there's usually plenty
of noise present.
Scott K9MA
sellington at ssec.wisc.edu
>From Jay <JPRYOR at uga.cc.uga.edu> Fri Sep 15 13:01:04 1995
From: Jay <JPRYOR at uga.cc.uga.edu> (Jay)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 95 08:01:04 EDT
Subject: Contest Technique
Message-ID: <950915.080719.EDT.JPRYOR at UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
What's the best operating procedure for the following scenerio? I am
basically thinking in terms of Sweepstakes, but this could apply to many
contests:
Station 1 has mega-watts and is running stations on "his" frequency. I am
listening and hear Station 2 work Station 1. I need the Station 2
multiplier. What's the best way to work Station 2?
I usually wait for Stations 1 and 2 to finish, then call Station 2 a little
off frequency -- in the "direction" he is moving, if I know. Sometimes it
works; sometimes it doesn't. Is there a better way?
- Jay, K4OGG
K4OGG
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list