Sept. 95 ARRL VHF Contest scores summary
klimas at uhavax.hartford.edu
klimas at uhavax.hartford.edu
Fri Sep 15 11:04:15 EDT 1995
SOME SEPT '95 ARRL VHF CONTEST RUMOURED SCORES: by WZ1V rev. b
CALL W2SZ/1 W4IY W0UC/9 WB0GGM X
GRID FN32 FM08 EN44 EN34 X
CLASS M/U M/U M/U M/U M/U
6 340/44 215/56 145/83 69/37 Xneed
2 657/51 340/59 221/68 181/75 Xmore
222 171/31 66/29 52/35 44/23 Xmulti
432 272/36 109/37 94/42 72/27 Xunlimited
903 67/24 22/15 14/12 14/10 Xscores
1296 94/25 23/13 28/17 33/13 Xguys
2304 31/10 3/3 6/4 X!
3456 23/9
5760 23/9
10G 30/10 1/1 1/1
24G 9/6
TOTAL 1717/255 1044/210 557/260 420/190 X
Score 721,000 219,240 206,960 123,690 X
CALL W2SZ/1 W4IY W0UC/9 WB0GGM X
CALL K3MQH WB1GQR KR8L X K9PW WD8ISK WA2TEO K1RZ
GRID FM19 FN33 DN33 X EN52 EM98 FN31 FM19
CLASS M/L M/L M/L M/L S S S S
6 277/54 198/27 11/7 X 102/44 127/56 169/50 156/46
2 703/67 476/34 56/14 X 307/72 191/61 332/47 280/49
222 127/43 121/24 2/2 X 75/39 68/38 81/36 66/29
432 259/52 191/28 18/8 X 147/54 99/47 109/34 113/34
903 10/8 27/18 28/21 28/19 32/18
1296 30/17 44/23 37/21 29/13 43/19
2304 5/5 10/9 4/4
3456 5/5 2/2
5760 5/5
10G 3/3
TOTAL 1366/216 986/113 87/31 X 716/264 565/258 752/203 690/193
Score 378,432 146,700 3,317 X 296,208 234,006 228,000 196,600
CALL K3MQH WB1GQR KR8L X K9PW WD8ISK WA2TEO K1RZ
CALL KE8FD AA2UK WZ1V WB2DNE K2UOP/8 WR0G KD1DU K1TR
GRID EM89 FM29 FN31 FM19 FM09 EN31 FN31 FN42
CLASS S S S S S S S S
6 84/35 74/27 105/30 85/30 64/30 69/44 95/20 103/20
2 228/76 248/41 238/34 177/45 137/41 132/58 231/30 175/25
222 60/41 67/25 60/21 51/23 41/24 34/28 55/21 62/22
432 97/41 97/28 94/27 98/37 73/34 67/38 71/20 91/21
903 12/10 27/17 20/11 15/12 23/17 17/11 16/8
1296 19/14 43/19 35/15 26/15 27/17 20/16 24/10 19/10
2304 9/5 5/5 6/4
3456 1/1
5760
10G
24G
TOTAL 500/217 566/163 552/138 452/162 370/168 322/184 493/112 472/110
Score 156,023 146,700 112,608 110,646 100,632 85,192 78,512 78,400
CALL KE8FD AA2UK WZ1V WB2DNE K2UOP/8 WR0G KD1DU K1TR
More SingleOp scores totals - 50 144 222 432 903 1296 2.3
W3ZZ FM19 75,665 420/121 -
W1GCI FN42 73,944 409/117 - 84/22 157/29 55/21 62/19 20/11 27/13 4/2
WB2VVV FN21 65,900 392/103 - 68/20 168/22 52/20 58/19 20/11 26/11
KA2RDO FN12 60,000 306/130 - 55/22 129/38 35/21 54/24 16/12 15/11 2/2
W2HPF FN13 54,000
WA2BAH FN32 38,000
KD5RO ???? 34,000
WB2WHD FN22 26,000
KD6UIH DM13 8,510
Some QRP scores totals - 50 144 222 432 903 1296 2.3
KH6CP FN33 100,000 ??/?? ??/?? ??/?? ??/?? ??/?? ??/?? 38/18 ??
N7SFT DN32 2,130 59/30 13/7 34/14 4/3 8/6
W9SZ EN60 1,081 34/23 22/14 11/8 1/1
N3KKM/R 7,665 ??/?? 5 GRIDS ABCD
need more rover scores guys! not to mention more QRP scores!
Interim revisions to this file will appear on our Webpage.
A 'final' revision will be sent here at some later date.
Please send additions/corrections to:
_\\///_
secretary: (' O O ') North East Weak Signal group, ARRL affil.
---------------ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------------------------------
| 73 de Ron WZ1V, email: klimas at uhavax.hartford.edu |
| Grid FN31mp 6-1296 BBS: 203-768-4758 (weeknights/weekends only) |
| N.E.W.S. group Web Page: http://uhavax.hartford.edu/newsvhf |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From Jan Seay <jans at muskox.alaska.edu> Fri Sep 15 15:19:51 1995
From: Jan Seay <jans at muskox.alaska.edu> (Jan Seay)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 06:19:51 -0800 (ADT)
Subject: Cryogenic radio?
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.950915061635.22482A-100000 at muskox.alaska.edu>
I've wondered what I was missing on this subject. What little
operating I've done in the "Lower-48" gave the impression
that most guys couldn't take advantage of standard front ends
due to the amount of man made noise. What good is a receiver
that has a noise floor of -140 dBm when you have a half
microvolt of garbage from 2-30 mHz?
KL7HF
On 15 Sep 1995, sellington wrote:
> There was a demonstration of the noise-addition technique on NPR a few
> months ago. It was quite impressive. I'm not sure how valuable it
> would be for HF signal detection, however, since there's usually plenty
> of noise present.
>
> Scott K9MA
> sellington at ssec.wisc.edu
>
>From Setzler" <setzler at c813.npt.nuwc.navy.mil Fri Sep 15 12:36:16 1995
From: Setzler" <setzler at c813.npt.nuwc.navy.mil (Setzler)
Date: 15 Sep 1995 11:36:16 U
Subject: Contest Technique
Message-ID: <n1400957703.23094 at c813.npt.nuwc.navy.mil>
In phone tests this often works. When they have finished their exchange and
before station 2 has had a chance to move off, quickly dump in "KD1NG up 5
please". Then go up 5, hope there's room, and call KD1NG. The problem, of
course, is if there's too big a crowd already up 5. Move up just a little
more than 5 and call there.
James, KD1NG >> setzler at c813.npt.nuwc.navy.mil <<
______________________________________________________________________________
From: Jay on Fri, Sep 15, 1995 10:16 AM
Subject: Contest Technique
To: cq-contest at tgv.com
What's the best operating procedure for the following scenerio? I am
basically thinking in terms of Sweepstakes, but this could apply to many
contests:
Station 1 has mega-watts and is running stations on "his" frequency. I am
listening and hear Station 2 work Station 1. I need the Station 2
multiplier. What's the best way to work Station 2?
I usually wait for Stations 1 and 2 to finish, then call Station 2 a little
off frequency -- in the "direction" he is moving, if I know. Sometimes it
works; sometimes it doesn't. Is there a better way?
- Jay, K4OGG
K4OGG
>From Dan Norman KJ1N <dnorman at niwot.scd.ucar.EDU> Fri Sep 15 17:19:04 1995
From: Dan Norman KJ1N <dnorman at niwot.scd.ucar.EDU> (Dan Norman KJ1N)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 10:19:04 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Contest Technique
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950915094024.328A-100000 at gleneagle.scd.ucar.edu>
On Fri, 15 Sep 1995, Jay wrote:
> What's the best operating procedure for the following scenerio? I am
> basically thinking in terms of Sweepstakes, but this could apply to many
> contests:
>
> Station 1 has mega-watts and is running stations on "his" frequency. I am
> listening and hear Station 2 work Station 1. I need the Station 2
> multiplier. What's the best way to work Station 2?
>
> I usually wait for Stations 1 and 2 to finish, then call Station 2 a little
> off frequency -- in the "direction" he is moving, if I know. Sometimes it
> works; sometimes it doesn't. Is there a better way?
>
> - Jay, K4OGG
> K4OGG
>
This scenario happens all the time, especailly for the S&P guys and what
I find happening is most ops tail-end the QSO by saying "_____ up 5" The
only problem with that is if the frequency is in use, you gotta go even
higher (or lower) and hope the staion finds you--and usually he does, but
this method can anger alot of other ops who are on/near those
frequencies, but this is nothing new to contesting ;-)
One way is to quickly find a somewhat clear freq. nearby and ask the mult
to move to it, (providing he is still there) if that does'nt work, I just
hope I'll run across him later. IMO it's not worth stepping on stations
for my benefit, but some ops don't share this scheme... It really bugs
me to hear alot of negativity during a contest, but there always will be.
See you in SSB Sprint on Saturday!
'73 Dan KJ1N/0
Boulder, CO
http://www.ucar.edu
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list