NAQP QSY TECHNIQUES
BK1ZX70SFL at aol.com
BK1ZX70SFL at aol.com
Fri Aug 9 01:58:47 EDT 1996
I guess i am missing something...my ole KC keyer has 4 memories and one was
loaded with:
pse QSY to 28050 nw ok ? bk
....and the others were 21050/3550/1830....mebbe my approach was wrong and i
should manually send with a paddle "same vfo"...oh well, the paddle is still
necessary i guess :-)
zx
---------------------
Forwarded message:
From: KWIDELITZ at delphi.com
Sender: owner-cq-contest at tgv.com
Reply-to: KWIDELITZ at delphi.com
To: aa9ax at iglou.com, CQ-CONTEST at tgv.com
Date: 96-08-05 11:31:10 EDT
The only problem with "pre-set" QSY frequencies is that when they are in use
it undermines the purpose of the QSY request. You want to make it fast, so
you pick a frequency that is empty. QSYs in NAQP are often marginal, running
low power to a band with little propagation and you probably wouldn't make
the QSO if you didn't know what you were listening for. I had a few
occasions where I thought I picked a clear QSY frequency, but it turned out
not to be the case and I couldn't make the QSO. Finding the QSY frequency is
busy and moving up one or two just isn't going to be productive, cause the
guy you are moving isn't going to have the patience to look for you.
73. Ken, AB6FO, KWIDELITZ at DELPHI.COM
>From tomf at neca.com (Tom Francis) Fri Aug 9 04:59:47 1996
From: tomf at neca.com (Tom Francis) (Tom Francis)
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 23:59:47 -0400
Subject: RF Exposure Comments
References: <20960809020302/0006008716DC6EM at MCIMAIL.COM>
Message-ID: <320AB7B3.32D6 at neca.com>
Doug Grant wrote:
> p.s Did anyon else notice that the IRS guy was "putting his two cents' worth
> in". What's the deal here? DO they get a discount?
Doug:
No, but I'd be willing to bet that the first lawyer
who tackles him in a RF exposure case is going to
have a very interesting tax audit, heh heh heh...
73
Tom, NM1Q (tomf at neca.com)
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list