Calls from litigation
BK1ZX70SFL at aol.com
BK1ZX70SFL at aol.com
Thu Nov 14 21:04:35 EST 1996
I understand that there will be a seperate lottery for those who have sued
the FCC, the FCC is opening a new block just for these guys...Argentina has
sold the rights to the L (as in Litiguous) block, so look for:
L4DX, L4CW, L4RM, L4AR etc.
k4oj
(it fits like a glove and I should be able to slice thru the pileups with
it...yes, it was choice number 5 and I am making the best of it....there is
no, repeat NO truth to the rumors about my hoping in a Bronco and going after
the guy who got W4ZX)
>From w0mu at sprynet.com (Mike Fatchett) Fri Nov 15 02:20:57 1996
From: w0mu at sprynet.com (Mike Fatchett) (Mike Fatchett)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 19:20:57 -0700
Subject: Vanity my last thoughts
Message-ID: <01BBD260.F7B75060 at hd14-174.compuserve.com>
Just to clarify my point. I never said I was going sue the FCC nor did =
I advocate such. I did say that I thought to be fair, If wrong doing =
was found, would be to re-run it. Do I think this will ever happen? NO =
WAY!
My main concern is that people were told by the FCC that this would be a =
random drawing with nobody getting preference. As stated previously, I =
don't believe this happened. If they can "pull our legs" with the =
vanity calls what else are they doing?
I do believe that there should be some sort of investigation to either =
prove or disprove this. We all paid a fee for the opportunity to =
receive a vanity call under the guise that the drawing would be random. =
If the drawing was not random is this fraud? I am not an attorney.
Oh and by the way I am happy with the call I got. Yes I am thrilled =
that I even got the chance to get one. My morals tell me something =
seems wrong with this program and I felt compelled to respond.
I do plan on writing letters to my congressmen asking them to look into =
the issue and I encourage those who feel as I do to do the same.
For those tired of this thread QUIT READING THEM!!!!!! Hit the delete =
key when you see Vanity in the subject.
Mike
W0MU
=20
Good luck in the SS TEST this weekend!!!!!
>From graham at surfsouth.com (Graham Crosby) Fri Nov 15 02:33:13 1996
From: graham at surfsouth.com (Graham Crosby) (Graham Crosby)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 21:33:13 -0500
Subject: SO WHAT
Message-ID: <199611150229.VAA19033 at cindy.surfsouth.com>
So! You got your vanity call!................................WHO CARES?
So! You didn't get the call you
wanted!...........................................WHO CARES?
So! The FCC has yet to issue your
call!......................................WHO CARES?
GIVE IT A REST.
Graham Crosby K4XA
graham at surfsouth.com
People who think they know everything annoy the
PISS out of those of us that actually do.
>From aa0cy at robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (Robert Wanderer) Thu Nov 14 02:00:50 1996
From: aa0cy at robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (Robert Wanderer) (Robert Wanderer)
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 18:00:50 -0800
Subject: GATE 1 VANITY CALLS
Message-ID: <01BBD25C.EA9247E0 at robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us>
I understand Gate 2 call issuances are on hold because of lawsuits.
Does this affect Gate 1 (getting a call I held 30+ years ago?)
Thanks.
73,
Bob AA0CY
>From davew at bcl.net (Dave Williams) Fri Nov 15 02:56:02 1996
From: davew at bcl.net (Dave Williams) (Dave Williams)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 96 20:56:02 -0600
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <9611150256.AA27577 at onyx.bcl.net>
unsubcribe
==========================================================================
Dave Williams davew at bcl.net (217)224-8201 Quincy,il
==========================================================================
>From k7jj at ix.netcom.com (Dave Earnest) Sat Nov 16 03:03:48 1996
From: k7jj at ix.netcom.com (Dave Earnest) (Dave Earnest)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 19:03:48 -0800
Subject: The FCC Lied -Reply
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19961116030348.0068f210 at popd.ix.netcom.com>
Good Lord! Enuf is enough.
Ed carried my app to Pittsburgh and I got my 2nd choice. When I received
my conditional license 42 years ago, I didn't get a choice, but I do
remember I was thrilled with W7YBI.
When I upgraded to Advanced in 1968, I received W6HUQ; a reissue and really
had an OT call.
When I upgraded to Extra 12 years ago, I didn't succumb to the lure of the
FCC scrabble calls (2X1) and kept my W7KJJ (another reissue from 1974).
Like the old lady said, "Where's the beef?"
So now I have a 2 letter call. I put down 25 choices, got my 2nd choice and
am satisfied. I know of at least one fella who put in for 1 choice and got
it. Gosh, I don't know if he filed by mail or via email.
What has all the above got to do with contesting anyway?
73, Dave K7JJ. ex-op HZ1AB, KG6ICD, KA2RB, KX6BU
formerly: W7YBI, K0BQE, W6HUQ, KS6DY (KH8), ZL1BBA, KA2ZZ (Japan)
Dave Earnest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list