[CQ-Contest] Two contests within a contest?

[LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg]

I always confirm the call I worked, if i need to correct it. That's the
correct way... besides if I don't many will dupe me to make sure I have the
call correct...
So, lately I've been only answering with ? until I got  a complete call to
avoid this


lu5cw test
?$#%25BX
?
3249023-4w203bx
?
w6bx
w6bx 599kw
599ca
tu de lu5cw


I think it saves a lot of time... (sri to w6bx if he's reading ;-)

Adios

Ernesto Grueneberg LU5CW (ex LU6BEG, LU2BRG)
mailto:lu5cw at qsl.net
Other calls used: LU6BEG/PY, ZP5/LU6BEG, ZP5/LU2BRG, L3CW, ZP5XF (wpx cw 97,
iaru 97, cqww cw 97), ZW5B (cqww cw 95), LT4E (wpx ssb 95, iaru 95, wae ssb
95, cqww ssb 95), LW2DFM (ARRL rtty 97, jidx lb 94), LU4FM (wae cw 95, arrl
10 95, arrl cw 96, wae ssb 96, arrl ssb 97, wpx ssb 97), LP4H (cqww cw 94),
L70FM (cqww ssb 97) , LP4F (wpx cw 94), LT1F (wae cw 97, wpx rtty 98, arrl
cw 98), LS0A (arrl 10m 94,
arrl ssb 95), L73AA, AY1A, L40A (cqww ssb 93), L20A (wpx ssb 94), LU4AA
(iaru 93, wae ssb 93, cqww ssb 94), LU2DW (arrl ssb 95), LU7FJ (cqww ssb
1996), LU6ETB (wpx cw 96, wae cw 96, arrl 10m 96, arrl cw 97, cqww rtty 97)
, LT6E (wpx cw 95), LU6EBY (sac cw 94).
-----Original Message-----
De: Eskenazi/Leveque <k7ss at wolfenet.com>
Para: cq-contest at contesting.com <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Fecha: Sábado 7 de Marzo de 1998 04:01
Asunto: [CQ-Contest] Two contests within a contest?


>
>DX0DX and another guy XX0XX are running Ws. Its the ARRL test
>and 15 is wide open to the west coast.
>
>Scene One:
>
>"DX0DX... contest"
>(W6 garbled...)
>"W6.. 59 kilowatt"
>(roger its W6XXX 59 Cal)
>"DX0DX..contest"
>
>
>Scene Two:
>
>"XX0XX...contest"
>(W6 garbled...)
>"W6.. 59 kilowatt"
>(roger its W6XXX 59 Cal)
>"W6XXX ok..
>...XX0XX..contest"
>
>
>Spent a long time listening at the start of the contest Friday nite, had a
>huge traffic jam while driving home with lots of listening time in the
>mobile. I saw
>BOTH styles being practiced.
>
>Its obvious that these guys are not competing on the same field with each
>other.
>
>XX0XX is spending one more 'over' in confirming the call, and DX0DX is just
>letting
>the W6XXX assume that he got the call right, and is shortcutting the
>process of
>making a QSO. In fact, is he even MAKING a contest exchange?? He NEVER
>gives the callsign of the station he is working!
>
>Given all else being equal, DX0DX is going to save ALOT of time in his
>exchange, especially over 48 hours.
>
>A rather glaring inequity...?
>
>comments??
>
>73 de Danny K7SS
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com




--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com