[CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WW CW 1997 results...some analyse

Yuri Onipko ut4uz at idirect.com
Mon Nov 2 17:20:34 EST 1998

-----Original Message-----
From: i4jmy at migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG <i4jmy at migate.n8it.AMPR.ORG>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Date: Monday, November 02, 1998 2:34 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WW CW 1997 results...some analyse

>    If I'm not wrong, a certain mistakes percentage doesn't bring any
>  more to any disqualification, in CQWW. It was before the accurate log
>  checking that the 3% rule existed and could mean that.
You are talking about BAD or BUSTED calls removing, but what we have here is
ALREADY penalized LOG, I mean all these 20% or 30% removed points are after
log checker influence.
My thinking is that the LOG checker can  penalize your LOG more or less
on his own decision. I figured it out after analysing my SSB UBN file and
talking to some of the CQ WW committee guys (I had 9.4% loss after computer
checking and all penalties, and the amount of loss grew up to 13 % after log
checker's decision).
Finally it's right, since we all sign the agreement that the Contest
Committee's descision is final...
73  UT4UZ

CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list