[CQ-Contest] SS-LOG Super-Check
Barry Kutner
w2up at mindspring.com
Sun Mar 7 12:54:08 EST 1999
Someone said:
>
> >
> >#1..........SS is not Sprint. I don't feel SS should be checked as hard as
> >Sprint because of the tremendous amount of unique information that is
> >exchanged in SS. Too many variables with QRM and fading that allows one
> dit to
> >be lost which causes TWO QSOs lost. The penalty thing is ridiculous.
>
It surprises me that a contester would suggest lax log checking. The
whole point of the exchange is copying it (remember, the SS
exchange is based on the traffic handling preamble). Seems like just
another part of the "dumbing down" of ham radio, just like the
proposed licensing changes...
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up at mindspring.com
Newtown, PA FRC alternate: barry at w2up.wells.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list