[CQ-Contest] Log checking--report of collateral damage?

[Hans K0HB]

East Coast Bob wrote:
 
> About all this is going to do is cause the casual CW contester to stop
> entering. No one for whatever reason wants to be the guy to have any
> changes made to his log. 

Actually, I feel exactly the opposite!  In most contests (with the
exception
of November Sweepstakes) I consider myself a casual operator, but take
some
pride in trying to turn in the mythical golden error free log.  (Notice
I said 
"trying"!)

I enthusiastically welcome this new effort to determine who the *really*
good operators are.

> What I submit is my best shot at what I copied.

Same with me, and if my "best shot" is more accurate than your "best
shot", 
then I want to win.  

If my log is full of busted exchanges, then I want to know that too, so
I
can beat you next year.

73, de Hans, K0HB



~~~
  Observation the morning after the contest:

  "A logging computer lets you make more mistakes faster than 
   any invention in human history -- with the possible 
   exceptions of a quart of tequila and a borrowed Vibroplex 
   key." K0HB 
~~~


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com