[CQ-Contest] INRAD FT-1000MP MOD Summary

[Fatchett, Mike]

Well an overwhelming majority like the Mod.  Only one reply said the
difference was hard to discern.

I have ordered one and can't wait to get it installed.

I am also signed up to the 1000mp list.  I just wanted some feedback from
the contest community.

Thanks for the input.


Mike
W0MU


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From Ron Stordahl" <ron.stordahl at digikey.com  Thu Mar 11 16:25:08 1999
From: Ron Stordahl" <ron.stordahl at digikey.com (Ron Stordahl)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:25:08 -0600
Subject: [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call
Message-ID: <99Mar11.102823cst.27787 at gatekeeper.digikey.com>


How about working him, asking for the call, and if you don't get it scratch
the Q.  I think the number of scratches will be fairly low and I don't see
how you can be penalized for not having the Q in your log, but perhaps he
will be penalized for having the Q which is missing from yours.  Obviously
this depends upon how the checking software deals with this.

Ron N5IN


-----Original Message-----
From: John T. Laney, III <K4BAI at worldnet.att.net>
To: Bill & Chris Shell <n6ws at msn.com>
Cc: K7LXC at AOL.COM <K7LXC at AOL.COM>; cq-contest at contesting.com
<cq-contest at contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, March 11, 1999 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call


>
>If you ask for the call AFTER the exchange as Bill, N6WS suggests, you
>may well be ignored, or not even heard as the offending CQer hits the F1
>button after you say or send your exchange.  Probably it's best to ask
>for the call before giving your exchange.  73, John, K4BAI/8P9HT.
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com